User talk:PicassoPlent

Welcome!

Hi PicassoPlent! I noticed your contributions to Talk:Descon and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! -- Wesoree ^{(talk·contribs)} 17:53, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 21:04, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PicassoPlent (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I am not a sock. And what have I done that violated policy?PicassoPlent (talk) 16:18, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

First, if we unblocked every account we blocked for sockpuppetry just because they said they weren't socks, well, what would be the point of having a rule against sockpuppetry? Hmm? Think about it.

And as for the other part of your request, being a sockpuppet account is itself a violation of policy (In fact, whenever I read that argument for unblock, I'm almost sure the account is a sock). — Daniel Case (talk) 06:34, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PicassoPlent (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello but my case is different, I am actually not hear me out because what evidence is there that is telling the admins that I am a sock, at this point is it wild guess or what If you assume everyone is a sock just because of a 'guess'.. Please show me or tell me the evidence that I am a sock. I mean surelyy there must be some evidence needed, for all I know he just blocked me because they felt like it so that is why I just need to know the evidence of me being a sock?PicassoPlent (talk) 15:16, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As with your last request, this is nothing more than a simple denial, which, as has already been explained to you, is not sufficient. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:21, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.