User talk:PianoTalk

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, PianoTalk, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for 30 Seconds to Mars. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Aar☢n Bruce^Talk/_Contribs 17:54, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of awards and nominations received by 30 Seconds to Mars

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article List of awards and nominations received by 30 Seconds to Mars, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. neon white talk 18:36, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of MarsTV

A tag has been placed on MarsTV requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. FlyingToaster 17:40, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This Is War

I have now fixed this. I should also inform you of this discussion [1]. Regards, Nouse4aname (talk) 18:48, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand.--PianoTalk (talk) 18:49, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Concerns have been raised that you are a sock puppet of User:ItHysteria, based upon editing patterns here and on Italian Wikipedia. There is a section on the above discussion to which you can contribute should you wish... Nouse4aname (talk) 18:51, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have never contributed on Italian Wikipedia, I'm from Portugal.--PianoTalk (talk) 19:49, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Then I'm sure the checkuser will confirm this and you have nothing to worry about. In the meantime, please stop hiding the negative reviews on This Is War by putting them at the end of the review box that has a limit of 10 reviews. You aren't fooling anyone. Nouse4aname (talk) 20:16, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The "professional reviews" box has a maximum capacity of 10 reviews. It is aleady full. The reviews currently listed have been decided by consensus and should not be changed. Adding additional reviews is pointless as they will not be displayed due to the size limit of the box. Nouse4aname (talk) 20:51, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

They are both equally reliable. By the way, with that comment you have revealed your true identity... Nouse4aname (talk) 07:43, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]