User talk:Piano4ever

Genova and Dimitrov

A tag has been placed on Genova and Dimitrov, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Eeekster (talk) 11:35, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Aglika Genova and Liuben Dimitrov

A tag has been placed on Aglika Genova and Liuben Dimitrov, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Eeekster (talk) 11:36, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Genova and Dimitrov, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Genova and Dimitrov was changed by Piano4ever (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2009-01-11T11:39:25+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 11:39, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

Thispage is just about to be written since few minutes. Please live the people sometime, please, OK???--Piano4ever (talk) 11:41, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Genova and Dimitrov has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\byoutube\.com' (link(s): http://www.youtube.com/GenovaDimitrov) . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image or a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 12:26, 11 January 2009 (UTC) OK, I understand about YouTube, but please DON'T DELETE the whole article. Thanks!--Piano4ever (talk) 12:29, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to File:Genova & Dimitrov piano duo.jpg. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: File:Genova & Dimitrov piano duo.jpg was changed by Piano4ever (u) (t) blanking the page on 2009-01-11T12:39:11+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 12:39, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is not avandalim, because I am just trying to change the picture with another one, OK? --Piano4ever (talk) 12:43, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

spam

Genova & Dimitrov is a German piano duo, considered one of the world's finest and most successful young ensembles. by whom? no independent verifiable reference, spam/POV/vanity
the sensational international concert career of the Genova and Dimitrov duo began with winning all the major piano duo competitions no independent verifiable reference, spam/POV/vanity
Since then the duo has performed to great public and critical acclaim no independent verifiable reference, spam/POV/vanity
Duo has appeared in countless radio and TV broadcasts on all continents - Where in Antarctica?
In 2005, for their exceptional artistic achievements, the duo was awarded the honorary citizenship by the German government. no independent verifiable reference

There's more, but that's enough to indicate the problem. I've also just realised that most of the text is copied verbatim from here, so it's also a copyright violation (copyright © 2002-2012 Genova & Dimitrov Media). jimfbleak (talk) 15:42, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think you misunderstand. Copyright violations and spam are unacceptable and are deleted without discussion per speedy deletion guidelines. You also appear to think that it's for me to research and reference your article - actually it's your responsibility if you want it to stay (in a neutral non-copyright version of course). I'll get round to looking at the other items you think should be deleted, but one thing at a time. jimfbleak (talk) 15:59, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright

I've deleted the image you took from www.snomusic.com and gave a fake licence. Please stop using copyright material jimfbleak (talk) 15:51, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:CIVIL the picture in your "article" was taken from here, which claims copyright, but you claimed it was your own image (no camera metadata suggested it was not, so a quick search found the web site) jimfbleak (talk) 16:03, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've looked at the other duos, and I think you are right about at least some needing to be deleted. They're not as clear-cut as yours, so I might wait a while before having a better look. jimfbleak (talk) 16:10, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, Wikipedia takes a hard line on copyright, but if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) (which includes commercial use), you can of course use it. You just need to leave a message explaining the details on the article's talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.

There is no reason why this duo should not have an article, but you have to write it yourself, in your own words, fully referenced, and in an encyclopaedic neutral style. I restate - it is pointless to discuss proposed deletion of copyright or spam material, since its deletion is non-negotiable. I look forward to seeing a proper article on this duo from you jimfbleak (talk) 16:29, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what the problem is. Just write your new text and save it here as a new article - I've not prevented recreation. Incidentally, I've despammed two of the articles you listed, may do the others tomorrow jimfbleak (talk) 16:43, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Piano4ever (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have posted a completely normal text according to the Wikipedia rules and it was deleted just because Nick considered Piano4ever a sock puppet of Liuben. This is wrong!!!

Decline reason:

Block reason not addressed, see WP:GAB. — Sandstein 19:22, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.