User talk:Phytogreen

Welcome!

Hello, Phytogreen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 04:19, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Indian gooseberry. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. —C.Fred (talk) 04:19, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of edit warring, had you pointed out Caldecott's publication history on the talk page, then it would have been easier to see what the situation was. Instead, all I saw was an edit war. —C.Fred (talk) 04:35, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ok, sorry - i didn't think folks would make changes without actually looking at the material in depth

Truthfully, the "stop reverting it pal, I have all day" edit summary that you made...well, it didn't help your cause. Better would have been a positive "but Caldecott is published in..." summary. Better still, starting discussion on the talk page. —C.Fred (talk) 04:40, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]