User talk:Mario at Photo MV Ltd

Welcome!

Hello, Photomvltd, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Introduction tutorial
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Introduction to referencing
Help pages
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Schazjmd (talk) 15:19, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Hello Photomvltd. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Mariano Vivanco, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Photomvltd. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Photomvltd|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Qcne (talk) 11:49, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Qcne. Thank you for clarifying. This account is indeed under the supervision of the employer, Mariano Vivanco. We will add the proposed amendment to the user page. Photomvltd (talk) 12:10, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit requests

Hi. When you propose a change to an article on a talk page, you can add the template {{Edit COI}} to the top of your proposal. This causes your proposal to be listed on a category page that is monitored by some editors, giving it greater visibility. I have done this for you already on Talk:Mariano Vivanco. ~Anachronist (talk) 15:18, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]