User talk:Phonex01

Welcome!

Hi Phonex01! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! —C.Fred (talk) 12:05, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much. I'm intreseted in south indian history to prevent vandalize the page. Phonex01 (talk) 12:09, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Vellalar

Did you inadvertently leave a message on Talk:Vellalar while logged out? If so, I can refactor the page to attribute the comment to you and conceal the IP address from page history. —C.Fred (talk) 12:06, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, sir. Please proceed. Phonex01 (talk) 12:07, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done —C.Fred (talk) 12:11, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. If you don't mind, can you review the extended edit request? Phonex01 (talk) 12:13, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I already have. —C.Fred (talk) 12:25, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, sir. But you haven't reviewed those sources. I hope you'll verify. Phonex01 (talk) 13:26, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

With all due respect, I don't really intend to review the sources. I will determine if a consensus of editors exists to make a change, though. You haven't really shown consensus, though you did show a request for a third opinion. —C.Fred (talk) 15:47, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You might have seen that. Phonex01 (talk) 16:09, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Konguhead per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Konguhead. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 16:07, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Phonex01 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

According to wikipedia's terms and account policy, I didn't do any illegitimate activities and disruptive edits. Having only one account can't be considered as socket puppet. The @Suneye1 user had personal attack with me once. It's power abuse and complete nepotism. Phonex01 (talk) 17:12, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Nepotism is favoring family members, I'm not sure what that has to do with this. There are legitimate uses of alternative accounts, but you used another account after you were blocked. That is block evasion, a clear policy violation. When blocked, the block is on you as a person, not just your account. You may not edit under any account until the block is removed. 331dot (talk) 17:33, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.