User talk:Phoenix X91

Welcome!

Hello, Phoenix X91, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

There's a good intro on wikipedia syntax and style, that you might want to take a look at, see WP:MOS. Regards, --Oscarthecat 17:42, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not edit the user pages of other contributors without their approval or consent, as you did with User:Gdo01. It may be seen as vandalism. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 19:46, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop targeting one or more user's pages or talk pages for abuse or insults, unwarranted doctoring or blanking, as you did with User:Gdo01. It can be seen as vandalism and may get you blocked from editing Wikipedia. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 18:01, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User page vandalism

Why do you keep targetting my user page? To my knowledge I have never reverted any of your edits and its highly unlikely I have since all your edits up to this point have not been vandalism. Gdo01 21:10, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2006/Candidate statements

Your recent edit to Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2006/Candidate statements (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 13:51, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Paul Synder

A tag has been placed on Paul Synder requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Samtheboy ^(t/c) 16:48, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests. For more information about the do's and dont's of creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Samtheboy ^(t/c) 16:49, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Need help

How do I set-up my talk page to make it "lively" to have layouts , and pictures to make it "cool"(aka popular). Do I need to know the HTML language. Because I need help to set-up that.

Hi Phoenix X91. Please see for a start, Wikipedia:Userpage, and then for design information, Wikipedia:User Page Design Center, Wikipedia:WikiProject User Page Help and User:Danieltiger45/Userpage design. You can also browse other users' pages for design ideas To see how something is done on those pages, go into edit mode and study what's there and then you can experiment. A knowledge of HTML wouldn't hurt, but it's not necessary at all. Cheers.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:28, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Synder

Your article has been recreated at [1] and saved from being deleted. Zazaban (talk) 00:39, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, I saved it from being deleted. You're the one who contested the deletion in the first place. And no, a wiki article is nobody's property. Zazaban (talk) 00:44, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 01:06, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Revision history of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Double Standard

I deleted that because it's actually the re-direct to Double standard. The correct place for the AfD is Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Double standard which I see you started. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 00:59, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism

Please refrain from adding unnecessary information to Wikipedia articles, as you did in Douglas MacArthur High School (San Antonio, Texas). Midnight Q (talk) 01:00, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I graduated from MacArthur and have taught there as well. Thank you. Midnight Q (talk) 01:10, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks

Do not make attacks on people as you did here. Take a few minutes and read Wikipedia:No personal attacks. Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 01:05, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And I forgot, you should also read Wikipedia:Ownership of articles. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 01:07, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The link I gave you above to the users talk page is without a doubt a personal attack on that user. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 01:10, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Then you respond politely and calmly. Never respond quickly in anger. I have protected the page for a week so that the differences can be discussed on the talk page. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 01:18, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User:DerHexer. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —DerHexer (Talk) 22:32, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:DerHexer, you will be blocked from editing. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 22:34, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:DerHexer, you will be blocked from editing. —DerHexer (Talk) 22:34, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. henrik•talk 22:44, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Phoenix X91 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

had a bad day yesterday, and I'm sorry for the damage I caused.Okay I was just angry about something.

Decline reason:

Very understandable, as we all have bad days. The block is only 48 hours, so take the time to cool down. — Jmlk 1 7 10:48, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I need some help me here, what time does my ban last for just asking I'm not a moron. And also I'm sorry for the damage I did

Hello, Phoenix X91! You can view your block log [2], which indicates your block should expire around 16:43 December 19, which is in about 20 minutes. Regards.--12 Noon ^2¢ 22:26, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It would have lasted about another 20 minutes like Noon says, but I just unblocked you. Please don't do anything like that in the future. henrik•talk 22:28, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unacceptable edits

This edit to another editor's userpage is completely inappropriate, and is a rather offensive personal attack. Consider this an extremely strong warning to not repeat such actions again, or you may find yourself temporarily blocked. Thank you, Ariel♥Gold 21:39, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Jack?! 21:39, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinitely blocked

It has become apparent that your account is not used constructively, and that you have no intention of discontinuing the behavior that got you blocked just a few days ago. I have thus blocked this account indefinitely. henrik•talk 21:45, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Phoenix X91 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm sorry for the vandialsm and harassment I did to other wikipedian editors now. I've matured now to say that I'm sorry to people that I've bothered. I want to start off 2008 with a clean slate now. I'm sorry now . I ask all of the wikipedian editors , administartors to forgive me. I'm sorry for my childish attitude I had in 2007. I've reformed now.Can someone unblock please.

Decline reason:

You've been sorry too many times. Pass. —Wknight94 (talk) 18:28, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.