User talk:PhoenixOroboros

March 2013

List of The New 52 publications

Hi, I see you keep changing Green Arrow's city to Starling City. This is not the city he works out in the New 52. Starling City is simply the name for Star City ONLY in the Arrow (TV series). In the New 52, he is based out of Seattle, Washington, which is what the article should reflect if his city is at all mentioned in the article. Please stop changing it back to Starling, as Seattle is the proper. || Tako (talk) 21:50, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As i can see from your message you are not even reading Green Arrow. True Star City is the base of opperation from the Hood in Arrow TV Series BUT IT IS IN THE COMICS TOO! Seattle was onl for a year. Read the Wiki entry for Starling City goddamnit! -- PhoenixOroboros moved from user:Takuy— user page, where the user erroneously replied.

I've read every issue of the New 52 Green Arrow - the latest infact, states "Seattle" in the opening. I have no clue where you are getting your information from. || Tako (talk) 22:01, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

PhoenixOroboros, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi PhoenixOroboros! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Vandale Savage

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Vandale Savage, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Vandal Savage. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 10:00, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List of the New 52 Publications

Hi Phoenix- in my edit notes I suggested you read the talk page, where the details of these edits were discussed- current consensus is not to clutter the page with too much detail (ie- if the character is named in the title, it is fairly obvious that's who the title is about, so no need to fill that in) so as to keep the page tidy and readable. The general rule on Wikipedia is to go with the consensus of the majority of editors, so I have been reverting your edits. The best course of action, rather than to continue edit warring, would be for you to make your case for the inclusion of this detail on the talk page- I am open to your arguments, and would rather have another happy DC fan editing than the current fracas! If you need any help, hit me up on my talk page, and I will be happy to offer further advice. Hope this clears things up! Benny Digital ^{Speak Your Brains} 10:42, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 10:51, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]