User talk:Phils1982

Articles for deletion/Philip Schonewille decided {on a pretty apathetic vote) that the article you created at Philip Schonewille is not suitable for a Wikipedia article. I have moved it to User:Phils1982. You are at liberty to move it back into the (Main) namespace but bear in mind that if you do so, it can be speedily deleted on the strength of the AfD debate. -- RHaworth 02:44, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Carr Mill Dam

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Carr Mill Dam, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.visitsthelens.com/displayProduct.asp?product_key=44934&page_key=5&channel=vstRL, and therefore a copyright violation. Carr Mill Dam has been nominated for deletion.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Carr Mill Dam. Then you should do one of the following:

Make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL at the site of the original publication.
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions at wikimedia dot org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation.

If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Carr Mill Dam, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia.For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing! Dv82matt 12:50, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Paul Scholes. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. doomgaze (talk) 15:13, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "St Helens Rovers FC"

A page you created, St Helens Rovers FC, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how it is important or significant, and thus why it should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for companies in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Meph^talk 15:56, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of St Helens Rovers FC for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article St Helens Rovers FC is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St Helens Rovers FC until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Meph^talk 16:02, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Phils1982

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Phils1982, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. TheAwesome Hwyh 02:42, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]