User talk:Philotrio

Welcome!

Hi Philotrio! I noticed your contributions to Lloyd Triestino and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:08, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that additions to articles must be cited to a reliable source, like a history book or scholarly research paper. It'd be appreciated if you could add a citation for the material you added to Lloyd Triestino. In case you're not sure what a citation looks like, here's one:

<ref name="Doe 2020 p123">{{cite book |last=Doe |first=Joe |title=America Today |date=2020 |publisher=Big Books |isbn=978-1-1234-5678-9 |pages=123–127}}</ref>

All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:27, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 05:02, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Philotrio (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Not aware of any Odenwald Monkey in my house and neighbourhood.

Decline reason:

Confirmed sockpuppetry, one of the clearest cases I've ever seen. And not the first time you've been caught doing this. You aren't very good at this, I suggest finding another hobby. Yamla (talk) 10:08, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Philotrio (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Is Philosophy and Peace disturbing for Wikipedia, when you have all the bombs and cannons in the world also on Wikipedia. Philotrio (talk) 11:40, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

My use of the checkuser tool confirms that you have abused multiple accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 14:33, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.