User talk:Philosophydriven

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:NeuroSex per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/NeuroSex. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 22:28, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Philosophydriven (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not sure what this refers to, but I posted three peer-reviewed articles and a published book by a PhD scientist from a university press. These included verbatim quotes from each directly related to the entry. User Keyhound appears to be a WP:MEATPUPPET with WP:COI existing only to report all edits to the NoFap page to keep the public from being aware of this scholarship. As you noted in your checking, this is an IP pool used by thousands, if not millions including remotes, and has no connection to previous posts. The "pattern of posting" you suggest seems to refer to posting links to scientific articles, which were formatted differently and do not appear alike in any other respect that I can see. I understand needing to monitor pages, but these are non-vandalizing, non-sockpuppet suggestions on a talk page to scientific articles of high value to WP:SCHOLARSHIP being systematically blocked by false claims of WP:SOCK all by one user: Keyhound. Philosophydriven (talk) 22:59, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 01:02, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

For additional context, this reporting user exists solely to stop edits of NoFap with scientific citations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Keyhound. They do not appear to be reporting in good faith and are likely WP:MEATPUPPET as their talk page specifically planned with hundreds of users for days prior to the latest effort to patrol. https://www.reddit.com/r/NoFap/comments/125kj0f/wtf_is_going_on_with_wikipedia_nofap_creates/