Jump to content

User talk:Philosopher1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello Philosopher1! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! —The Great Llamamoo? 17:57, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Please be aware that you're only allowed to revert three times per day per article and you appear to be bumping up against that limit, if you haven't already broken it, on the Christianity article. A.J.A. 18:27, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the way I see it

[edit]

You're about to go over 3RR, you haven't even responded to the section on the Christianity talk page now dealing with your additions, you seem to be advocating through one of your latest edit summaries a philosophy that if there are citations anywhere in anything that you write that it is automatically neutral, you just blanked your user page after a sockpuppet tag warning, and as far as I can tell, maliciously tagged the person who tagged you as the same sock. I think you're heading for bad times if this is how you plan to edit Wikipedia as long as you're editing on it. Homestarmy 18:30, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Philosopher1 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The wiki is becoming a place of few privileged who have rated themselves and their group to get into conspiracy based editing in all places and spreading vandalism like in a article of Lingam.The common trend is to wait quietly for some inaction and revamping article without any discussion and are thus sources of racism and disregard to subjects which can be maligned easily.

Decline reason:

Conspiratorial and faux-populist grandstanding rhetoric won't get you anywhere here. — 210physicq (c) 03:45, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


Yes its all a group of F.U.B.A.R American Christian administrators.

[edit]

I wonder why there are no admins from other countries - there is no rhetoric - its a fact .Bloody circumcised assholes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Philosopher1 (talkcontribs)

Hi there. I'm the admin who blocked you. I'm an atheist from Ireland. Pleased to meet you :) - Alison 13:53, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Extended block to 48 hours. Looks like you could use more cooldown time.--Isotope23 16:02, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


I just reverted your personal attack upon myself and another administrator. Do it again and your block will be extended - Alison 04:38, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]