User talk:Philopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Philopedia, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Longhair | Talk 14:01, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Herodotus map

I don't know of any map that thries to include all the peoples, but here are some that show the larger groups (and if I recall correctly, the Loeb edition locates and details them as they come up; I don't recall whether or not it has any maps, though):

http://www.henry-davis.com/MAPS/Ancient%20Web%20Pages/109.html = http://www.hindunet.org/saraswati/aryan/herodotus.html

Britannica: http://concise.britannica.com/ebc/art-2196

http://www.mlahanas.de/Greeks/Bios/HerodotusMap.jpg

http://images.search.yahoo.com/search/images/view?back=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.search.yahoo.com%2Fsearch%2Fimages%3Fei%3DUTF-8%26p%3Dherodotus%2520map%26fr2%3Dtab-web%26fr%3Dush1-mail&w=145&h=91&imgurl=www.livius.org%2Fea-eh%2Fedges%2Fherodotus_map_s.jpg&rurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.livius.org%2Fea-eh%2Fedges%2Fedges02.html&size=4.6kB&name=herodotus_map_s.jpg&p=herodotus+map&type=jpeg&no=5&tt=113&oid=0892986517d3b0de&ei=UTF-8 (http://www.livius.org/a/1/maps/herodotus_map.gif) -> may be used in Wik if citation is given.

http://www.paim.net/images/herodotus.jpg (from http://forums.atlantisrising.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/000813.html)

http://images.search.yahoo.com/search/images/view?back=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.search.yahoo.com%2Fsearch%2Fimages%3Fei%3DUTF-8%26p%3Dherodotus%2520map%26fr2%3Dtab-web%26fr%3Dush1-mail&w=876&h=272&imgurl=www.livius.org%2Fa%2F1%2Fmaps%2Fherodotus5_map.gif&rurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.livius.org%2Fhe-hg%2Fherodotus%2Flogos4_10.html&size=18.2kB&name=herodotus5_map.gif&p=herodotus+map&type=gif&no=15&tt=113&oid=93be27b89c5725f8&ei=UTF-8 (http://www.livius.org/a/1/maps/herodotus5_map.gif)- an uncontorted map

Kdammers 12:14, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

East End

Hi, replied at my place. Easier to keep conversations in one place. Cheers. Kbthompson 10:08, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Dignitaries.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Dignitaries.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Shell ^babelfish 04:09, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Dignitaries.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Dignitaries.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:04, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hauptschule

You wrote that you did not like the passage about the family background of the Hauptschüler. I do notlike it either and I think it should be changed. Your comment has been in place for several years now and nobody came and said the passage should stay like this. So I think you can change it now.-- 95.88.136.199 (talk) 12:40, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

               ___________________________________________

Hello and thank you for your comment! I see that you have not adopted a wikipedia nickname yet, but I hope you may look back here to review my response and, if you wish, to carry out a dialogue.

Thanks, as well, for reminding me of my earlier remarks and intention to make a change in the article. In the meanwhile I have had second thoughts. In many German states, the intented role of the Hauptschule, e.g., as a training place for artisians, is not being fulfilled. Instead, the Hauptschule have become a catch-all for problem cases. Just one example: the very early streamlining of children into Hauptschule, Realschule and Gymnasium (about age 10) means that children who enter school with any type of difficency have practically no time to make a correction before they are assigned to one of the three types of middle schools. As a result, the Hauptschule are have a very high portion of children from immigrant families who, predictably, are weak in German as they use another language at home. [Note: today one entering schoolchild in three will have at least one immigrant parent]. Some of these children are quite bright and will feel underchallenged in the Hauptschule; others will suffer from problems associated with cultural misadjustment and social acceptance, not to mention unemployment, which is disproportionately high among immigrant families. All of this contributes to a syndrome of self perpetuating prejudices as featured in the article.

Finally, while I think it is possible to challenge the description in the article based on it being point of view, I feel I should defer the action of changing the text to someone who has more direct experience with the Hauptschule. On the other hand, as you wrote, my comment has been unaddressed for over a year now. So I will give the matter further thought and, perhaps, make an adjustment after all.

Philopedia (talk) 00:27, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Philopedia. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]