User talk:Philipcosson

Welcome!

Hello, Philipcosson, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --Nsevs • Talk 06:44, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

SID

Please see User talk:Nsevs#SID. -- RHaworth 19:11, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Unfortunately, I'm going to have to put this one on you as far as content... I know very little about the topic at hand. From what I can tell from the revisions, it seems that one term replaced the other with the advent of digital x-ray... I'm not sure beyond that. Let me know if you ahve trouble with formatting or layout. Sorry I can't be of more help... --Nsevs • Talk 19:43, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Emi1010.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Emi1010.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:06, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Prayer Blog

A tag has been placed on Prayer Blog requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 10:20, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

If you cannot meet WP:V by providing some reliable sources for this page, its going to be deleted. KillerChihuahua^?!? 10:54, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

I see you are making an effort, but unfortunately the sources you've added are no good - they do not meet the requirements. The first is about the Wailing Wall, and the second is a blog. Also, paragraph two violates What Wikipedia is NOT (WP:NOT) a how-to. I think perhaps you need to read up, maybe Wikipedia:Your first article, and let this article go. Try again when you know a little more about how to do it. KillerChihuahua^?!? 12:00, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

I am limited in time and I feel this page deserves time to mature. The original speedy delete was lifted by Ironhand. You threaten deletion, but I don't think that is the correct procedure. The reference is about prayers by email which are not meant to be read, which is linked to prayer blogging. this is not an inflamatory article, nor dose it bring wikipedia into disrepute. It is clear that new phenomena must be able to be added in wikipedia (otherwise it will become reactionary and irrelevant). Detailed referencing is clearly difficult in these circumstances. If in the next month or two this topic has not matured sufficiently, it should be deleted - but I disagree you have the final say about this, you must follow procedure. This is not my first contribution or my first page - I try to contribute where I have knowledge, I'm not good at contributing formatting. Philipcosson (talk) 12:26, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Magazines

A scientific journal ("Radiological Physics and Technology") wants to use your picture of the very first CT scanner prototype on their front cover. Since it's GFDL, we've told 'em it's okay, and they'll be crediting you. DS (talk) 19:02, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Prayer blog

The article Prayer blog has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability issue. Looks like original research. Unsourced.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joe McNeill (talk) 23:35, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Housefields Sketch 2005.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Housefields Sketch 2005.JPG.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Thanks again for your cooperation. —Matr1x-101 _{(Ping me when replying)} {_{user page} ^{(@ commons)} - _talk} 19:36, 21 August 2023 (UTC)