User talk:Philip Austin
|
Disambiguation link notification for October 29
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Frederick Seitz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Turnbull. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:19, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
Nicolas Rossolimo
[edit]Hi, I gather from an earlier edit summary that you are a relative of Nicolas Rossolimo. Your first-hand knowledge is potentially very useful, we may even be able to bring the article up to Good Article status. The problem with wikipedia is we need to be able to verify any assertion we make, and cite a source; simply claiming firsthand knowledge isn't enough. For example, you may know firsthand that Rossolimo was an Orthodox Christian but until I found the reference to him being buried in the R.O.C. cemetery in New Jersey in Chess Life we couldn't really justify including the Orthodox categories in the article. Even now I haven't seen any source suggesting that he was particularly religious; biographical articles about him don't usually discuss religion.
Anyway as a family member you must have access to a lot of documents, newspaper clippings etc that most of us don't have. If you can cite some of these in the article that would be a big step towards improving it. Let's start with the R.O.C. - was he devoutly religious or just "culturally" Orthodox? Any references for this other than firsthand knowledge?
One other thing, I found this Russian language article on Rossolimo. It looks potentially useful but it states as a fact that he was killed by muggers, whereas from what I understand the exact circumstances of his death are unclear and subject to speculation. This makes me think the article may be unreliable - could you give it a quick fact check and let me know what you think? Regards, MaxBrowne (talk) 23:55, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
- To MaxBrowne -- The Russian article might seem at first "interesting", but the biographical portion is riddled with inaccuracies, errors, speculation, and outright nonsense. In particular, IGM Nicolas Rossolimo was not killed by muggers, but suffered an accidental death following a fall on his way home from the "Rossolimo Chess Studio" in Greenwich Village late at night.
- OK I'll treat that article as unreliable. Another thing I noticed in it is something about him changing his name from Verukov; I don't believe this for one second, it appears to have originated in usenet posts by Sam Sloan. The stuff about his problem compositions is interesting though. Do you know how many of them he published, what years, and in what magazines? MaxBrowne (talk) 04:42, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
- The name "Verukov" is utter nonsense. The family name, on his father's side, has been "Rossolimo" for centuries. There is even a street in Moscow -- Ulitsa Rossolimo -- named after his uncle, Dr. Grigory Ivanovitch (1860-1928), who was a very famous neurologist and psychiatrist, and a professor at Moscow University.
- Sure, like I said I give no credence to it. What do you know about his problems and endgame studies? MaxBrowne (talk) 08:37, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
- The name "Verukov" is utter nonsense. The family name, on his father's side, has been "Rossolimo" for centuries. There is even a street in Moscow -- Ulitsa Rossolimo -- named after his uncle, Dr. Grigory Ivanovitch (1860-1928), who was a very famous neurologist and psychiatrist, and a professor at Moscow University.
Help me!
[edit] | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
How do I reply to a message that I've received on my "User:talk" page in response to my editing of a Wiki page? Thank you. Philip Austin Please help me with...
Philip Austin (talk) 20:27, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- Philip Austin, first, when on your talk page, you go to the "edit" tab on the top right section of the page. When you do, scroll down, and look at my response to you. You'll see a colon (:) before my comment, which slightly indents my response, indicating that it is a response to the comment before it. If you were to reply to this response, you would put (::) before your comment, or two colons, indicating that it is a response to the previous comment, which had a (:). You'll receive a notification of the replies up at the very top of the page, next to your username. To reply to a comment posted on your talk page, go to that section by scrolling down, and finding the section enclosed in question marks (==Like this==). Go below the comment you want to reply to and type (:), and then your response. I hope that answers your question! If you need any more help, feel free to replace the "helpme" tag, or visit us on the irc help channel: https://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=#wikipedia-en-help. Quinto Simmaco (talk) 20:40, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- Quinto Simmaco -- Thanks, Philip Austin.
Nomination of Alexander N. Rossolimo for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alexander N. Rossolimo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander N. Rossolimo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 17:53, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Philip Austin. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Philip Austin. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Circular references
[edit]
Thanks for contributing to the article Alexander N. Rossolimo . However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Kuru (talk) 22:40, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Philip Austin. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)