User talk:Phildav76

Note!

Feel free to leave me a new message. Please sign your messages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically include your name and the time of your message.

My welcome message is saved here for posterity.

The New Den stadium

You are right - the New Den is in Southwark Borough, in Livesey ward in fact. Welcome to Wikipedia! David | Talk 12:08, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Priština article

Hi Phildav76, [1] I noticed you reverted the name of the city to the Serbian naming, with the claim that "Revert. The blanked Albanianisation means half the links won't work for a start!" My question is, did you test whether links work or you just speculated? Whenever one clicks on the Albanian name of the city, it still gets redirected to the abovementioned page. Don't you think that a double-naming system "Albanian/Serbian" is proper, and is in accordance to how all cities in the place itself (Kosovo) are named? (actually they are named in Turkish as well in Kosovo). Regards,Ilir pz 20:43, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you seem to be very careful in "serbianizing" the name of that article by the way. If you take a look at the official naming of the city by the international administration, it is "Pristina" not with the serbian letter. But I guess as a native speaker of Engliš you know that that letter does not exist in the Engliš alphabet. Or does it? We should start calling Bush - Buš :). Regards, ilir_pz 23:56, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I change it back each time I see someone has done an obvious Ctrl-H search and replace - for example look at [2]. The problem is that they even changed the Serbian name as specified at the top and all the language links. The logic I am following is the set out in here: [3]. When the diacritics aren't used then yes it is Pristina, but as the guideline says that they should be used when possible. Another example would be to look at this page [4], as you can see Stankovic is missing the diacritics whereas on wikipedia there is an Dejan Stanković article with the diacritics. The real argument is whether in the English version of wikipedia should the Serbian or Albanian version of the name be used. Currently the Serbian one prevails as the "h" is very rarely used. One thing for you to notice is that I haven't altered the Prishtina District name or the links on Template:KosMunic. Good night, I am sure there will be a reply waiting for me in the morning, but this is really my final word on the subject unless there is a new consensus reached. --Phil 00:32, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sure there will be a reply. I would encourage you to take a look in the website of the UN Interim Administration[5] , and check the official name used for the capital of Kosovo. And yes, it is "Pristina" not the Serbian version. "Dejan Stankovic" is a Serb. Sure you would try to follow his original name. Sure the version with "sh" is used quite often, read above "Bush" for example :). Compromise on using the naming convention used by the UNMIK should be reached, not the Serbian version. Good night. ilir_pz 00:40, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well the UN page doesn't have the diacritics on any of the Serbian names either, so it doesn't really answer the question either way. It is all rather inconsistent. I would like to think that wikipedia contributors have a higher attention to detail --Phil 07:32, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is inconsistent to refer to the UN Administration in Kosovo, to the ones who make the laws, and have more right to make decisions than anyone else? Now this is inconsistent. Anyways, I started a discussion in the talk page of the article, if you care to give your opinion there, fine, if not I will still continue the process of changing that Serbianized name to the English version used by the International Admin in Kosovo. Regards, ilir_pz 12:30, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I explained myself in the talk page of the article. Looking forward to your opinion there. ilir_pz 00:50, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Inadequate sourcing

Hi Phildav76,

Thanks for your contributions to Operation Horseshoe. However, I've had to revert them, on two grounds:

1) Your additions aren't sourced. This is a fundamental requirement - please see Wikipedia:Verifiability.

2) You've added a link to an article from a personal website. Unfortunately we can't use this. Wikipedia articles should use reliable published sources - see Wikipedia:Reliable sources.

If you can find an equivalent citation from a reputable source then please feel free to add it, but I'm afraid the source you've cited simply isn't admissible. -- ChrisO 23:26, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Propaganda

Not sure I understood correctly your comment/irony here. Care to clarify? Thanks in advance, ilir_pz 23:41, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it needs any clarification. When you start to use words like "apartheid" to describe Kosovo from 1989-99 it is an insult to the people in South Africa who really suffered it. - Phil 01:13, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is not an insult but a legitimate comparison. Besides the discrimination on the color of the skin, all the rest has been similar to South Africa. Prove me wrong! In Kosovo Albanians had: no right to schooling, leading the country, were being beaten in the streets, were being massacred, prisons were filled with Albanians, no right to work, no right to use our own language in public, etc. I just gave you some, you decide. The discrimination based on skin colour was replaced with the discrimination based on religion, or language, or culture. It is a form of apartheid. ilir_pz 09:44, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

But you don't back up your claims with any credible evidence yourself. For a start what country was there for the Albanians to lead, when they only inhabited a province? They refused to serve in the army, didn't participate in elections. If they had done they would have a substantial presence in the republic and federal parliaments and certain control of the provincial one. They didn't pay any taxes or duties. The parallel schools were for Albanians only. This meant a major ethnic division which will continue for a long time. The standard of education was lower than what they would have got in the state schools. Albanians like the Hungarians and other minorities had the right to be educated in their own language. The boycott was not practiced when there was a need to use the expert services and facilities of the national health system such as maternity care, treatment of serious diseases, complicated surgical procedures. I would read the link on your page to rutgers but it doesn't work I'm afraid. -- Phil 12:18, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You obviously know some, but not enough to be able to ironize my comments. Kosovo had a status which had almost the same rights as the rest of the federation units, it was a federation unit..until its autonomous status was abolished. Hence, the boycott started. How would you participate in institutions installed by the regime of Milosevic? you obviously cannot imagine that. They did not serve in the army, because several Kosovar Albanians were killed with the explanation "committed suicide" somewhere in Army barracks of yugoslav army. That might be the case for one, but not if there are tens of them committing suicide. Of course you would not take place in elections organized by Milosevic. In that way you would accept the occupation. But you cannot understand that either. Parallel schools were organized because Milosevic installed a completely different regime in schools, where directors were brought from Serbia, or were Serbian, and the school programme was approved by the Serbian Ministry of Education. You would not understand this either. It is better to have a lower standard (ooops I got a MSc degree abroad somehow with that level), than to obey an occupatory regime such as Milosevic's. Seems like you did not know the fact that health and maternity care was also private, by Albanian privately owned clinics. Where do you get all your info, I am very curious? What do you base your speculations on? ilir_pz 12:52, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The autonomous status was reduced because Serbia had no say in the Constitutions of Provinces ostensibly within its territory. Unexplain deaths/suicides happen in most armies in the world (see Deepcut Barracks for example). Claiming the boycott was simply because Slobodan Milošević was president of Serbia is not really a good reason. What would happen if all parents around the world withdrew their children from school simply if they didn't like the government that ran their country? All my information is gathered from the internet. Well done on the MSc abroad. But mathematics is the same whether the education ministry was run by Albanians, Serbs, Yugoslavs or Madagascans -- Phil 13:16, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hehe you do it like Homer Simpson, once he even believed that Internet would get his kids at home, after a snow-storm. Not everything is explained in the Internet, buddy. Not that Milosevic was just ugly for us, Albanians, and we suddenly decided not to get our children to a school just because we did not sympathize with him, there is much more to that. But you definitely seem to like one side of the story. Enjoy it. ilir_pz 14:07, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure I follow the Homer Simpson/internet thing. I do remember him exclaiming with surprise that the internet was now on computers and trying to set up a snow plough business. Was it this episode - Skinner's_Sense_of_Snow? The quote is at the bottom I think. The problem is that there are very few unbiased sources on the internet. Nearly all of the British press (broadsheets, BBC) was very anti-Serbian from 1991 onwards and continues to be that way up to the present day. It supported Slovenia and Croatia sucession from Yugoslavia, the Bosnian Muslims against the Serbs and Croats, the Albanians against the Serbs and later against the Macedonians and most recently has been for the independence of Montenegro. Finding an even handed sources of information in the UK was difficult hence the internet being a place where more views are available. -- Phil 14:26, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, that's the episode, quoting:

Marge: This terrible! How will the kids get home?
Homer: I dunno. Internet?

I did not know that British press was as anti-Serbian as you claim. A whole country cannot be synchronized in a way that you describe. But anyways. Some things need time to be documented fully in Internet for users like you to access them. Kosovo issue, in particular, is not well documented..The war ended only 7 years ago. There are still news on the WW2 events, and none is surprised that that is the case. But the lack of information in Internet does not justify you in calling my statements as propaganda, or one-sided. I might have had the bad luck to experience those that I mention here, and no way I am trying to make up stories. My conscience does not allow me to lie about that. Nothing that I said so far in Wikipedia was any different from what I have experienced myself, or have read (and I provided sources). Regards,ilir_pz 14:36, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well considering all of Iran denies the holocaust...I'm sure it's possible.:)) C-c-c-c 00:07, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Montenegro

I myself would've gladly voted for the construction of the Montenegrin wikipedia - but I just see it wrong before we finally determine the full construction of a Montenegrin language. I just see it wrong not to wait. --HolyRomanEmperor 14:14, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It would seem logical to wait and see, especially if the language is not full defined. How much would it differ from the Serbo-Croat and Serbian ones that already exists? --Phil 15:06, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, effectivly - there would be no factual difference with the Serbian language - except in written form, when the Montenegrin alphabet would contain an extra letter. --HolyRomanEmperor 00:28, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a difference between the languages as there is between UK English and US English such as different words for certain objects (e.g. nappy/diaper), different spellings (Color/Colour) or pronounciations (leisure)? --Phil 13:46, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well - the Serbian language has many dialects - and ofcourse, they contain different wording. The language that the Montenegrins speak is the same that the Serbs of Herzegovina and Dalmatia speak - it's similiar to the Bosnian & Croatian Serbs' Serbian - but very different from the Serbian language spoken in Serbia. The Montenegrin dialect contains archaism - it prefers Old Serbian wording, rather than the internationalization that's taking place within the Serbian language. As for spelling - it has 3 new letters, but they have been invented just now (or better, are being invented). --HolyRomanEmperor 13:58, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Old Montenegrins speek and write one language wicht we canne select somthink like betwen Croatien (Dalmatian) and Serbia. After the Serbo-kroatien L was learnit at School the Serbian L hase stardet to dominate. HRE you cant say that the Shumadia or Sandjak is speeken the same L. You are accepting the Bosnjan L wich is betwen the Serbian and Montenegris L and you dont wount to accept the Montenegris L. Oh comme every boody in Balkans know thate--Hipi Zhdripi 23:57, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, not connected to Croatian Dalmatian - the same as the language spoken by Serbs (not Croats) in Herzegovina and Dalmatia. Phil - sorry that I used your talk page to reply. I hope that you don't mind. --HolyRomanEmperor 14:40, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is ok HRE. I seem to start these disucssions off with a simple question or a revert on the Priština page and I get a new message every time I log on. --Phil 14:48, 9 June 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Well, see this. It is a detailed map of shtokav dialects. The one you see in Yellow is the East-Herzegovinian dialect - the largest of them all. It's also the oldest - and that eastern half is formed on the basis of the historical Serbian state - the western are mostly Serb migrants in front of Ottoman conquests (and Croats that adopted that dialect, respectivly). --HolyRomanEmperor 16:47, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:States of Germany

Any particular reason for the change? ~ trialsanderrors 18:15, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I changed it to have two images so that it was more balanced looking. I have done something similar with Iran and Mexico sub-divisional templates. What do you think? Phildav76 18:38, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Problem is that on my browser I got 14 states in the first row and 2 in the next. I think we can combine the two, double images and the hard breaks between sets of states for four balanced lines of text. ~ trialsanderrors 18:50, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania as the last one on the first line. I guess you are using a higher resolution. I have changed it now so there are three rows. Let me know what you thing Trialsanderrors. Phildav76 20:17, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good now. I just removed the align=100% and moved Lower Saxony down for vertical symmetry. ~ trialsanderrors 20:19, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Two last changes: I added the navbox and changed the color so that it matches the other nav boxes at Germany (which seem to be in need of editing too.) ~ trialsanderrors 20:42, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The New Den

Hi, thanks for the message on my page. Yes indeed, you have very cleverly picked up on a geographical techicality! Part of our ground is in the London Borough of Lewisham, which places that part in New Cross SE14, but the majority, Zampa Road, Stockholm Road and Bolina Road SE16, is in south Bermondsey in the London Borough of Southwark! (I wonder do we have to pay Council Tax to both?) Speaking of Simon Hughes, he and Clive Efford are along with my self of course, in regular attendence. Thank you for your kind wishes for the forthcoming season. Best wishes, Lion King 15:13, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

correcting mistakes?

First of all, in Prishtina article, you were not "correcting mistakes", but you are just pushing for your personal view on the naming of the article, which coincides with the Serbian version (somehow). Seems like reverting is not good then, do not do it. ilir_pz 11:05, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is a very tired argument. Yes I was correcting mistakes - such as all the links to the articles of the Kosovo capital in the other languages. There is no point in having a link to a re-direct. Your allegation of me pushing my personal point of view is very hypocritial considering your latest edit to the Kosovo article. Phildav76 11:20, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cool!

Cool. I live in Offerton. Kind of curious that you can meet anyone in the whole world and you still occasionally bump into people who have lived less than 40 minutes walk away from you. :-) --Lord Deskana ^{Dark Lord of YOUR OPINIONS} 22:44, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure how many wikipedians there are but they must be a few from Stockport! There seems to have been a spate of vandalism on the Stockport page recently. -- Phildav76 22:48, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unsolved murders

I like the idea of the article. However I wouldn't try to make it totally comprehensive (there are something like 900 murders a year and not all of them are solved). Instead I would try to restrict it to cases which attracted a lot of attention or are famous for being unsolved, and add more information about the circumstances and whether there is a possible solution. (Some of the early 1970s cases may be solved by cold case reviews, like the Roy Tutill 1968 case was) David | Talk 09:29, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Auto-correcting

Hiya. I notice you've been going around 'tidying' with AWB. I'd like to ask you to check your edits more carefully. I'm not going to go through all your edits, but one obvious recent mistake you made was this edit. You may think it helpful to correct the vowels in the name, but in doing so you effectively removed a fundamental template [6] and a category [7]. So it would be great if you could check more carefully - especially with templates and categories. Oh and it would be a bonus if you could check your recent edits for similar problems, and fix the J-Lo article. Thanks. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 18:12, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am still working on the Lopez to López changes. Obviously I cannot do them in one go. Phildav76 18:28, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. After three days and a further thirty edits I thought you might have forgotten. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 18:38, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It involves a few article re-names so I am planning a strategy! Phildav76 18:40, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your prompt attention, and future vigilance. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 00:00, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mediation time on Kosovo

I don't think we're getting anywhere with the Kosovo introduction, particularly since Ferick has openly rejected WP:NPOV and is now refusing to discuss sources. Accordingly, I've submitted a request for mediation. Please indicate on that page whether you consent to having the matter mediated. -- ChrisO 09:36, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

re: County templates

Hi there. The bold effect for the county town works for me on my browser (I'm on Firefox) so I'll carry on "bolding" the county towns (so at least for those who can see it bold will see it bold).

Greater Manchester and Merseyside (and possibly other metropolitan counties) already have templates - maybe these existing ones should be changed to incorporate information such as towns and parishes?

Keep up the good work - all English ceremonial counties should have one of these county boxes. :)

David 13:41, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

County towns - I would use the traditional county towns of the traditional counties (if that makes sense) rather than any modern day administrative HQ. We are after all dealing with the ceremonial/geographical counties, not administrative ones! David 17:32, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jennifer López

Hi, I have a question for you on her talk page. Thanks. Crumbsucker 08:40, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A user made incorrect accent changes to several people which caused this confusion. I'm in the process of fixing some. All the Lopez changes need to reverted too. Crumbsucker 02:17, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit to User:Phildav76/Regional templates

I edited this page not realising it was a user page. Can't be awake yet! No offence intended. Mrsteviec 08:59, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This helps me. There are a variety of styles used for these footers. I've collected the ones I've found so far here: User:Mrsteviec/Navfooters. I'd really like to get a standard one sorted. Mrsteviec 09:33, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

re: number ones

Hmmm, ok... yeah I was going by what was in his column, counting from "Poor Little Fool". I haven't taken the time to manually count them all from 1958 onwards, but if you feel strongly that Bronson made an error then go ahead and change it back. Or if you want to do the manual count, be my guest :-) Later..... -- eo 18:03, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well arent you organized! You counted the Twist only once, right???? Maybe you should shoot Fred an email - maybe he'll publish you! I wrote to him once a few years ago and was shocked to see it in his column the following week. - eo 18:38, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nice. Did you win a prize for the trivia contest? I wrote in once like seven years ago and asked if anyone who used to work for Billboard (editor, writer, chart person, janitor, whatever) ever had an entry on a Billboard chart. The answer was Jimmy Buffett. Blech. -- eo 19:20, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for joining the Cheshire WikiProject

Just a quick note to thank you for joining the Cheshire WikiProject, and that it is good that the project will make sure that more towns and villages in Cheshire will make use of your very useful county template. Please feel free to help out if you are able to and want to. (Incidentally, I used to use SAS quite a lot when I was a research advisor as part of my last job.) DDStretch (talk) 17:41, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Sutcliffe Google Map

Hi Phil - thanks for the feedback on the Peter Sutcliffe Google Earth overlay thing I did! I'd gladly accept any help you could give me in really pinning down the locations. Most of the map is in high-res so I guess it will be possible to make it very clear and exact if you've got in the necessary info.

Thanks again Carpsio 14:06, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rock Era #1's

Hi PhilDav

I noticed that you posted the following once - "Well no need for me to do a manual count - I already have an MS Excel file with all the Rock era number ones in it! No doubt someone will write to Fred pointing out his error"

I am really interested in this information (the Rock Era spreadsheet) and was wondering if you would be willing to share the file? Please let me know. You can send me an email at Mrdook@yahoo.com

Thanks —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.187.137.39 (talk) 19:21, 15 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

County Template

I see you have been a regular editor of the County Template. I have posted some points on the template's discussion page, and would be grateful for your comments. Pixie2000 (talk) 14:01, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hot 100

So it is 939 number-ones, including "This Is Why I'm Hot"? I'm glad you responded - I knew there was someone who was keeping track and who sent me a spreadsheet one time, but I couldn't remember who! Somehow the total got off track again - thanks for fixing! - eo 19:29, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

I want to thank you for improving the article about Dobrica Cosic —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.133.87.170 (talk) 19:04, 18 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Way you are vandaling

Way you are vandaling in sq.Wikipedia ???, if you dot stop, you must be preparet thate Im going to do in en:Wiki and in sr:Wiki--172.182.77.99 05:50, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kosovo: country debate

Hello. There's a discussion going on Talk:List of countries as to whether or not Kosovo should be included in that list. You contributed to the same discussion at Talk:List of unrecognized countries and I thought you might be interested. The articles List of countries and Annex to the list of countries (where the inclusion criteria reside) are both relevant. Cheers. DSuser 13:28, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. It's probably a minor point, but there a discussion and vote going on at Talk:Kosovo#Kosovo:_terminology as to whether or not it's better to use Kosovo rather than Kosovan or Kosovar in the Wikipedia articles. Perhaps you have no interest, in which case sorry to bother you! DSuser 15:47, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Bindicapriqi

Thanks about the message. I have reverted back his last edit at Priština. It has been rather tedious having to revert his changes to the Kosovo related articles the last week or so. Do you think it's advisable we seek the help of an administrator in at least giving him a warning, temporary block, or something else entirely? Thucydides of Thrace (talk) 14:14, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We could seek to either give him a temporary block or warn him not to make edits to Kosovo-related articles. If you could be so kind to talk to an administrator, I'd appreciate it, seeing as you have already dealt with these sort of things. I'm relatively new to Wikipedia, so I am inexperienced with these matters. Thanks. Thucydides of Thrace (talk) 14:26, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

He has again made undiscussed changes to Priština. I have now informed the administrator DragonflySixtyseven about the matter. Thucydides of Thrace (talk) 05:06, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a detailed message for Bindicapriqi, explaining the situation to him; I believe him to be well-meaning but stubborn. I don't want to block him, but I will if it becomes necessary. DS (talk) 15:47, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your "adopted kid"

The kid that's not your bio better be the same race as you. 71.135.53.150 (talk) 03:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am not a biological parent nor one that has adopted either. Phildav76 (talk) 14:37, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Unsolved murders in the United Kingdom

An editor has nominated Unsolved murders in the United Kingdom, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unsolved murders in the United Kingdom and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 22:07, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re: 1000th number one of the rock era

drum roll please...... "I Kissed a Girl". Blech, too bad it isn't a good song. Ah well. - eo (talk) 10:36, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Phil, The Kammite/Pollardite trolls have again been active maliciously editing my wikipedia age. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_Clark_(writer) The page as it stands gives a wholly unbalanced account of my journalism- the likes of 'philip cross' and 'le contexte' are only interested in putting in the articles which they think show me in a bad light. Some of this editing is quite pathetic, such as Philip Cross's insertion of my wife's maiden name in attempt to show I'm a hypocrite by calling Denis McShane by his real name (which I saw you questioned). As an impartial editor who doesn't bear me a grudge, might you be able to keep an eye on the page and improve the editing to make it a more accurate account of my work and the themes I write about. Many thanks, Neil Clark (writer) Neil Clark (writer) (talk) 18:51, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Cheshire newsletter

Delivered on 19 January 2009 by Nev1. If you do not wish to receive future newsletters, please add two *s by your username on the Project Mainpage.

Questionnaire

In an effort to assess the progress of Wikiproject Cheshire, it has been decided to send a questionnaire to members. To answer, please copy this questionnaire and paste your answers on the answer page. While participation is, of course, not compulsory, thoughtful answers will help the project to develop and improve. Thank you.

1. The project is always looking for new members, so we want to find out which ways of attracting and approaching potential members work best. Do you remember how and why you joined?

Answer:

2. How would you describe your involvement in the project? What activities do you undertake and how often do you edit Cheshire-related article?

Answer:

3. Do you feel like you receive adequate support/contact from project members?

Answer:

4. The project talk page is intended to be the hub of the project, where members discuss articles and help each other improving them. Until very recently it has been almost inactive, but do you check the project talk page?

Answer:

4a. If the talk page was more active, would you get involved in discussions there?

Answer:

5. When viewing Cheshire-related articles, are there any issues that have stood out as needing attention or frustrated you? (Traditional counties POV, poor coverage about a particular subject, vandalism going unnoticed etc)

Answer:

6. Maintaining the Cheshire portal is one of the Cheshire WikiProject's main aims, providing a display of the best and most up to date articles that are part of the project. There is currently a drive to promote it to featured status, but input from a wide range of members is needed. Do you have the portal on your watchlist?

Answer:

7. Would you be interesting in subscribing to a newsletter covering North West England, with details of work done by WikiProjects representing Cheshire, Greater Manchester, and Merseyside?

Answer:

8. Finally, are there any improvements or initiatives you'd like to see WP:CHES undertake, or general comments you'd like to make?

Answer:

Daily Kos article

Hi Philip!

Yes, I'm aware of that article, thanks for pointing it out anyhow! It's just a bunch of obnoxious FUD promulgated by Ullmann. Somebody eventually noted to him that none of us SC regulars is actually a "Serb nationalist" (I myself am an ethnic Croat, and was moreover a refugee ~year as a kid when Serb rebels attacked my hometown, so I cannot possibly advocate "Greater Serbia" ^_^). It's just that Ullmann seems to be deeply indoctrinated with a prejudice against Serbs, which is a very sad thing indeed (I'd say a type of mental illness no different than nationalism itself).

After that fiasco he changed the tactics to advocate some imaginary "intractable technical difficulties", that upon analysis ended up affecting almost 0.00001% of the entire Web population.

I think that he is a CIA agent with more then obvious agenda - promote dirty lies and hatred amongst our brotherly South Slavic nations. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 23:32, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kerry-Dukakis

Tell me when the article with that photo came out.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Djamo (talk • contribs) 22:38, 13 January 2010

Not the Kerry article. When did the faith in action propaganda article come out.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Djamo (talk • contribs) 03:39, 14 January 2010

Disambiguation link notification for March 6

Hi. When you recently edited Notts County F.C., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tommy Johnson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: High Peak election results graph

Thanks for the heads-up. I had the Labour and Conservative results flipped in my spreadsheet. I have fixed it and uploaded a new version, though it seems to be taking Wikipedia's servers a long time to update the version they serve with the page.—Jeremy (talk) 15:15, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possible removal of AWB access due to inactivity

Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]