User talk:Philbarker
Folksonomy
[edit]Hi Phil - just a note to say I agree with your change (removing what folksonomy is not). I did a bit of additional work on the page. I'm going to leave it be for now.Bryan 15:49, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
re: Boroughmuir RFC
[edit]No problem at all :-) --Cactus.man ✍ 11:37, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
socks
[edit]Please see user talk:N.Fegen. I have also noted User:Fedgin. Having multiple accounts is not illegal, providing they are not used as sock puppets. But they can be confusing. If you have multiple accounts, please indicate it on the relevant user pages. -- RHaworth 17:44, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- No I'm not the same as User:N.Fegen or User:Fedgin : Neil is a colleague of mine, we're doing some joint work on Wikipedia. N.Fegen is Neil's id for articles written on work time, Fedgin for stuff he does in his own time. Thanks for moving our LOM page to a more approprate location (though as you noted, it's not yet up to scratch) --Philbarker 13:49, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
King George's Fields
[edit]Hi Phil. If you feel like getting thoroughly involved with this I have an excel sheet showing where the other fields are. I have simply run out of hours in the day to handle it for the present. if I knew how to I should create a wikiproject for itFiddle Faddle 21:23, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry no. I have an interest in Caister-on-Sea, where I used to play on the King George Playing Field, but not in any other KGV field. But good luck with the project.--Philbarker 21:46, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- That's precisely how I started, with the field in Worcester Park. Ah well. Fiddle Faddle 21:59, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
Drugs
[edit]Thank you for your edit on Edinburgh. Could you take a look on the page Temazepam, which is bloated with Abuse stories from Edinburgh and Victoria. Who is Heather Ashton, the author of the study cited as ref? My motive was the hope to get some discussion with the locals about the validity of these claims. There is also a big news story about death and amputation etc on this page, which I copied to Edinburgh for discussion. (Now deleted, unfortunately without a good comment which I could carry over) 70.137.181.232 (talk) 16:43, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
Infobox added in Captain Alatriste
[edit]This is a stock message to a number of people who have contributed to the article on the ‘’book’’ series of Captain Alatriste as an FYI. I have added a character infobox to the article. If you have time, enter the edit function in article and fill in appropriate information after the = sign. Fill in only what you think applies, but please leave all fields there. If nothing comes after the = sign, then it won’t appear in the article. On the other hand, if someone DOES think the field applies, they can add pertinent info. I do understand that this is technically a series article and not a character article. I’ve added the info box because 1) the series does revolve around Alatriste in large part and 2) the box really does improve what little is on the article right now. If a character article is created, we can copy and paste over. IMHO (talk) 03:07, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
OER inquiry
[edit]Hi Philbarker, I'm sending you this message because you're one of about 300 users who have recently edited an article in the umbrella category of open educational resources (OER) (or open education). In evaluating several projects we've been working on (e.g. the WIKISOO course and WikiProject Open), my colleague Pete Forsyth and I have wondered who chooses to edit OER-related articles and why. Regardless of whether you've taken the WIKISOO course yourself - and/or never even heard the term OER before - we'd be extremely grateful for your participation in this brief, anonymous survey before 27 April. No personal data is being collected. If you have any ideas or questions, please get in touch. My talk page awaits. Thanks for your support! - Sara FB (talk) 20:46, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Philbarker. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Philbarker. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Philbarker. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]Your draft article, User:Philbarker/sandbox/Micro-credential
[edit]Hello, Philbarker. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox/Micro-credential".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (talk) 09:59, 24 March 2022 (UTC)