User talk:Philadelphia Jo

Welcome

Hello, Philadelphia Jo! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Epeefleche (talk) 08:06, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

February 2012

Hello Philadelphia Jo. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about following the reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Epeefleche (talk) 11:22, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Philadelphia University (Jordan)

Hi, I wanted to let you know about some issues I saw while editing this article.

First of all, please don't directly copy text from the university web site to Wikipedia. Even if Wikipedia got permission to use that text, it would still need to be significantly rewritten to be in Wikipedia's encyclopedic style, rather than the university web site's self-descriptive style.
I noticed use of footnotes such as the following: The name "Philadelphia" is derived from the cultural heritage of Jordan<ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jordan</ref>. However, if you need to link to the Wikipedia article about Jordan, the appropriate way to do that is with a wikilink, that is, putting the article name in double brackets. The name "Philadelphia" is derived from the cultural heritage of [[Jordan]]. would be displayed as "The name "Philadelphia" is derived from the cultural heritage of Jordan." You don't need a footnote for that.
Similarly, there were other footnotes such as the following: The Philadelphia University entered into several agreements and memoranda of understanding with many academic institutions as follows: * Cornell University - USA <ref>http://www.cornell.edu/</ref>. However, http://www.cornell.edu/ is just the main page of the web site for Cornell University. It doesn't say anything on the main page about Cornell having an agreement with Philadelphia University. References should go to a source that proves the point that you are trying to support, namely, that Philadelphia University has an agreement with Cornell.
Finally, I noticed <small> tags around the footnote references. Those aren't needed. The footnote call numbers are already small enough.

Thanks for your attention to this. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 08:50, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

Your addition to Philadelphia University (Jordan) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

I already explained above the other problems with this edit in my comments above. If you disagree with my comments and you think that your edit was fine, please discuss that on Talk:Philadelphia University (Jordan) or on my talk page, User talk:Metropolitan90. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 01:47, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]