User talk:PhenomenonDawn

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Des Vallee (talk) 19:23, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Kansas SB 180) for edit warring.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Star Mississippi 21:04, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PhenomenonDawn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It's unclear what part of the edit warring rules I'm breaking, and no additional information was provided. I am actually the party following the (BRD) cycle. Please see page history. I rewrote it once, was reverted, rewrote it again, was reverted, and then blocked.PhenomenonDawn (talk) 21:51, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The BRD cycle requires that you discuss your changes. Please point to where you discussed and obtained WP:CONSENSUS for your changes. I cannot see any consensus on that article's talk page. Instead, you clearly engaged in WP:EW. Yamla (talk) 21:58, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PhenomenonDawn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have spent considerable time describing the current issues on the talk page and am also seeking dispute resolution through the Neutrality noticeboard. I am requesting an unblock due to demonstrating an understanding of Wikipedia's process. PhenomenonDawn (talk) 14:10, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You're only blocked from editing that one page. Once you've shown you can establish WP:CONSENSUS for your desired changes on that page, you should request unblock. Given your misunderstanding of WP:CONSENSUS, WP:EDITWAR, WP:OWN, and WP:BRD, this is the best path forward. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 14:52, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.