User talk:Phemeral

ROENTGEN STORIES

Regarding:

Jumping the gun, aren't we? If you'll check the history of the ROENTGEN STORIES page before posting, you might notice that I only just created it. Currently, I'm in the process of adding content, unless you expect a gorgeous, content-filled page to suddenly pop out of nowhere, fully created.

Please don't get offended if your article gets prodded. The prod tag was designed so that it cannot be deleted until 5 days after it's been tagged, and the prod be overturned by any editor. The reason I put it there is to make sure the page is not orphaned and empty, it's hard for pages to get attention a period after they are created. The vast majority of new articles do have at least a sentence of encylopedic text, so yes, I think it's natural to expect some text.

You can use the {{underconstruction}} tag to indicate you're going to finish it, since it's hard to tell if you intend to finish creating the article. Sorry if I caused any offense. hateless 07:49, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't be offended if it was prodded, say a day, a week, or even half an hour after it was created. Then I might tend to agree with you. However, I am a little annoyed that you didn't bother to check the time of creation before tagging the article. That, and the fact that the article was created by a registered wikipedian, might have made you think twice about questioning the author's intent before you took action.

Thanks for explaining yourself, but it'd be nice if you lost the elitist attitude and learned to respect your peers, or at least their work. It'd be another thing if you were admin, but you're a fellow common editor and the obvious oversight shows a disregard for the works of others that really doesn't work on a cooperative effort like Wikipedia. That is what I take offense to.

--Phemeral 07:59, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think I was doing anything wrong at all. Frankly, all you had on that page when the prod tag went on was a picture and a caption, an all-caps article title that does not conform to Manual of Style, and that I could have been tagged for speedy delete under CSD A1 if I was the elitist you claim I was. The fact is that I don't know if you were planning on updating the article at all, since there was no text that could be considered a part of an article, and as I said, the vast majority of new pages have at least one sentence of encyclopedic text (from past article I've reviewed, I don't consider captions to be a part of article text). What I created was a safety net that ensured the article was going to be completed or deleted if it was neglected. If you feel offended by that, then sorry if thought that you created an improper article. But I don't agree I'm being eltist at all. hateless 08:37, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hyde - 'Facts' section

Just nitpicking on one regarding his 'favourite brand of cigarettes'. According to several fansites, his favourite brand is "Cherokee".

Please feel free to change it. I don't presume ownership over the article. But thank you for the heads up; I have no idea what the man smokes...I don't particularly approve of it--what if he got cancer, not to mention the damage it does to his voice.

Phemeral 18:39, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Hydefaith.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Hydefaith.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 06:10, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Hyde faith cover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Hyde faith cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 05:02, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Evergreen.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Evergreen.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:45, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Shallowsleep.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Shallowsleep.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:43, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Roentgendvd.jpeg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Roentgendvd.jpeg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:32, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]