User talk:Phantom gamer 1993

Courtesy notice

Hello, Phantom gamer 1993. This is a courtesy notice that you were mentioned at an administrator's notice board. Here is a link. -- Diannaa (talk) 19:34, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for block evasion; being an admitted sock of User:Absolution provider 1999. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Diannaa (talk) 20:04, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Phantom gamer 1993 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was just messing with everyone, nobody can prove that I am a sockpupeter.Can anyone???? Phantom gamer 1993 (talk) 20:09, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 20:12, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

In other words, yes, yes we can prove it. Even if we couldn't, this post is either a confession or trolling, and trolls are far less welcome than incompetent sockpuppeteers. Ian.thomson (talk) 20:18, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]