User talk:PhantomScott

I believe you have to be an autoconfirmed user (10+ edits, 4+ day old account) to upload files. NawlinWiki (talk) 02:18, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Testing.ogg

Thanks for uploading File:Testing.ogg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:24, 13 April 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Leo 03:24, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Keshaforwardstiktok.ogg

Thanks for uploading File:Keshaforwardstiktok.ogg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:24, 13 April 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Leo 03:24, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Testing.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Testing.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:23, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Keshaforwardstiktok.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Keshaforwardstiktok.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:24, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Testing.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Testing.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:34, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Keshaforwardstiktok.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Keshaforwardstiktok.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:34, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated addition of unsourced information

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to List of backmasked messages. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Cresix (talk) 20:07, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Stupid Warning/Stupid People

You posted:

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to List of backmasked messages. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Cresix (talk) 20:07, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please (somehow) answer me how the hell I'm suppose to contribute to Wikipedia without every damn edit being reversed? As much as I like editing to find some nutjob (Not you) reversed it then pulls out some Bullshit excuse - It is beggining to annoy me. Firstly I added quotes - It was removed by someone for no reason. I added the actual sound file - Removed. I re-added and explained - Removed. So now you somehow expect me to pull out a random website for a 4 lyrics backtracked message. Awesome - I'll get right on that because I'm sure a website exists? I have found better things to do on Wikipedia and that's to question every edit I don't agree with I have jumped the Bandwagon and will start harassing people on talk pages, oh I will comb through the list myself and remove ones that aren't properly quotes and/or sourced.

Thank you for making me realize how idiotic Wikipedia is on new editors and how any edit that helps is removed for stupid reasons. --PhantomScott (talk) 23:15, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you'll bother to actually read the blue links in the warning, you'll probably learn a lot about what you're doing wrong. Everything on Wikipedia must have a reliable source. If it didn't, this would not be an encyclopedia; it would be a huge, chaotic mess of personal opinions. And quotation marks or the actual sound file is not a reliable source; it's your interpretation of the backmasked message. If you don't want to edit according to Wikipedia's policies, then you don't need to be editing. Let me also suggest that you read WP:5P. Thank you. Cresix (talk) 23:53, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Now, regarding your statement "Stupid Warning/Stupid People":

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Cresix (talk) 23:53, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh emm gee, you take titles waaaayyy to seriously -_- Also I was editing within guidelines - It just gets removed. You can say "you weren't" but i'm sure every edit I made was within guidelines and if it wasn't it was because the previous was removed when it was within guidelines.--PhantomScott (talk) 22:24, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Let me suggest that you carefully read WP:V, WP:RS, WP:CITE, WP:NOR, and WP:NPOV. Now, there's no point in my arguing with you, so if you have other concerns about List of backmasked messages, please address those concerns at the article's talk page so that you can get responses other editors' responses. Cresix (talk) 22:48, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]