User talk:Pgallert/RfA voting criteria

Interesting reading. The first point of interest was you saying that it's become recently fashionable to publish RFA criteria. I was thinking something similar back in January 2006 [1]. Then I got further interested in thinking about how mine and yours varied, why, and in what ways yours was better. Not sure I have time now to go into all that though. Peter 22:47, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the comment, Peter. My rationale was to replicate in writing how I arrive at my "gut feeling" votes. I must admit I hardly ever browse a thousand edits before casting a vote at RfA or making up my mind about a candidate. I look at top edited pages, the talk page (that alone says a lot, you are right), a few very recent edits, and then I dig a bit deeper if I find something fishy like 50 edits to a single AfD, a vandalising user without talk page (never been warned), and such things. What I don't like are these "only 650 deleted edits" kind of comments, they are not helpful. --Pgallert (talk) 12:06, 17 April 2010 (UTC)