User talk:Petrukhina

December 2011

I don't know what the background behind the battle between you and Illyukhina, but I do see that virtually all of your editing has been edit warring on articles where Illyukhina has done likewise. I also see that you have never made any attempt to explain what you are doing. This is not how Wikipedia works: if you find that another editor disagrees with your editing, then please discuss the issue, and try to reach agreement. If you continue in this way you will be blocked from editing. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:39, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Sasha (talk) 22:22, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 16, 2011

Well, I am not involved in the editing war. What I am doing is just reverting all articles edited by User Illyukhina Illyukhina talk contribs to original text. User Illyukhina Illyukhina shows consistent vandalism in mass editing of Biographies of living persons on Wikipedia without providing an edit summary or any reasonable explanation. User Illyukhina Illyukhina in not willing to discuss anything, please check the history of User Illyukhina talk, all the warnings and conversations are deleted by Illyukhina. Petrukhina (talk) 22:37, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

this is called an edit war. There are many other things to do here on Wikipedia, please leave reverting her edits to other editors with more experience. Sasha (talk) 01:42, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. Dismas|^(talk) 03:00, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:09, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am posting this on Illyukhina talk page and hope Illyukhina will not delete it: "Can you explain what is your mission? You are doing more harm to Wikipedia by MASS editing the Biographies, specifically as you do not speak English well. Your obsession with Soviet Union goes beyond Wikipedia guidelines. Once again, can we discuss your controversial changes? Thank you." Petrukhina (talk) 15:45, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

    Well, Illyukhina deleted my post, so I posted another one:
    -- Asking for dialog --
      Illyukhina, once again, can you answer my questions instead of deleting them? It's just not nice and violates Wikipedia rules. Petrukhina (talk) 20:49, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note

Would you please stop warring over nothing at Mikhail Gorbachev (or get blocked, both). Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 12:45, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Materialscientist (talk) 13:29, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vladimir Ivashko

Ukraine was not a country during Soviet times, it was a republic within the Soviet Union. --TIAYN (talk) 16:30, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, but the name of that republic was still Ukraine. Petrukhina (talk) 16:33, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

THe Ukrainian SSR, which is noted; is says, Poltava, Ukrainian SSR, Soviet Union, not the Soviet Union nor Ukraine. --TIAYN (talk) 16:43, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm ordering an admin to block you - you seem to have a problem with current and former nations: ivashko was born in the Soviet Union, just as Augustus was born in the Roman Republic, not Italy. --TIAYN (talk) 16:48, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for continuing your edit warring and feud with Illyukhina. If you continue in this way it will not be long before you are blocked indefinitely. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:26, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Karl 334 ^{☞TALK to ME ☜} 20:14, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Since your recent block expired, almost all of your editing has been reverting of edits by 116.39.110.175. If that were the only issue with your recent editing, it would raise questions about whether you were stalking that person's editing. However, it is not the only issue. I have no doubt that the IP address in question has been used by Illyukhina, and I am confident that you are aware of that. You have therefore been continuing the fight with Illyukhina that has led to previous blocks. I have no preference for either side in this fight as far as the content of the articles is concerned, in fact it seems to me that much of the dispute is about differences so trivial that I wonder why either of you cares about them either way. However, the constant edit warring and feuding is unacceptable, so you have been blocked yet again. In your last block notice, you were warned that continuation would be likely to lead to an indefinite block. The only reason why I am not imposing that indefinite block now is that in the past you have made attempts to start discussions with Illyukhina, who has not responded, which does give me some sympathy with you. I am therefore blocking you now for three months. However, continuation of edit warring, or feuding with any individual editor, or other disruptive editing, may lead to an idnefinite block without further warning. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:45, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  I understand what I did wrong and I promise to follow Wikipedia guidelines in the future. 
  In particular, I will report vandalism to administrators instead of edit warring with vandals. 
  As I am blocked now, I cannot properly report obvious case of vandalism and sockpuppeting. 
  It appears that after being blocked the user Illyukhina immediately started mass editing of biographies of living persons 
  using IP 211.253.60.34 and, so far, did 50 edits today 02/28/2012, of course without providing edit summary or valid source.
  Thank you! 
  Petrukhina (talk) 18:54, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012

A warning posted on User talk:211.253.60.34

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]