User talk:Petlif

Welcome!

Hello, Petlif, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Fvasconcellos (t·c) 22:13, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it seems as if you've been around awhile. Anyway, welcome, and thank you for your edits to lorazepam. Happy editing, Fvasconcellos (t·c) 22:52, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lorazepam

Hi again. I'd like to thank you once more for your additions to the lorazepam article, they have added greatly to its comprehensiveness. Unfortunately, your recent addition of anecdotal reports (personal testimony from Talk:Lorazepam) doesn't meet Wikipedia's Verifiability policy. I realize they may seem like a worthy addition, but the veracity of anonymously added information is all but impossible to verify. Best, Fvasconcellos (t·c) 23:24, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No prob, fair point - I'll get proper source for it some time. Thanks for your hard work on the references. Petlif 06:14, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, and thank you. You've done great work on the article yourself. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 14:27, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image and references

Sure, I'll whip up a composite of some other models with different lighting and then you can see which one prints out best. As for the references, don't worry—I'll format them again as soon as I have time. Best, Fvasconcellos (t·c) 16:45, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've replaced the image, see what you think. If it still looks the same, you may have to bypass your cache. As for the references, I'll get started on them soon; if you'd like to add formatted references yourself, have a look at this template filler by User:Diberri. Just paste the PMID into it and it outputs a complete reference, e.g. PMID 8232 becomes:

<ref name="pmid8232">{{cite journal |author=Greenblatt DJ, Schillings RT, Kyriakopoulos AA, ''et al'' |title=Clinical pharmacokinetics of lorazepam. I. Absorption and disposition of oral 14C-lorazepam |journal=Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. |volume=20 |issue=3 |pages=329-41 |year=1976 |pmid=8232 |doi=}}</ref>

Which you can just paste into the article. Best, Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:20, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, references done. Best wishes, Fvasconcellos (t·c) 17:32, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That new image looks a bight lighter in the carbon section, should print out better. Thanks.Petlif 23:06, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:Ativan77.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ativan77.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 23:48, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Happy (Old) New Year!

Two weeks too late, you say? Not in the Julian calendar!
Here's hoping the new year brings you nothing but the best ;) Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:37, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The design of this almost completely impersonal (yet hopefully uplifting) message was ripped from Riana (talk · contribs)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ativan77.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ativan77.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:34, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Petlif. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Petlif. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]