User talk:Peterdexheimer
A belated welcome!
[edit]Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Peterdexheimer. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
- Editor's index to Wikipedia
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.
Again, welcome! Doug Weller talk 08:16, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions alert for articles and content relating to Falung Gong
[edit]This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have recently shown interest in Falun Gong. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Doug Weller talk 08:17, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
- Hello Doug Weller, thanks for the info. I thought my reverting was correct because the Epoch Times showed the Prime Minister's document. The award was thus backed up with facts. So if the New York Times or any other media gets an award and publishes it itself with the necessary facts, then this is not a serious source anyway, right? Best regards Peter (talk) 14:12, 6 September 2018 (UTC)