User talk:Peterdaveloose

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Marco Rubio appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. Manway (talk) 01:15, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I beg to differ

The items I posted about Marco Rubio were possibly seen as hurtful to his reputation. However, they are true facts and are fully documented. I read the wiki on NPV (neutral point of view) and it says that confirmable facts are neutral by virtue of what they are. The truth. I feel as if my posts were unfairly removed by some Republican interest, and that is just not right.

August 2010

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Manway (talk) 23:54, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In answer to your message, you need to read the WP:BLP article. In that statement of Wikipedia policy, it states: "Biographies of living persons (BLPs) must be written conservatively and with regard for the subject's privacy. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a tabloid: it is not Wikipedia's job to be sensationalist, or to be the primary vehicle for the spread of titillating claims about people's lives, and the possibility of harm to living subjects must always be considered when exercising editorial judgment. " (italics mine)

You can't tell me that by inserting the claims, sourced as they may be, into the article, that you were not trying to harm Rubio's reputation. This is not what Wikipedia is for. Start your own webpage to smear the man. Say what you want there. But keep it off here.

If you have any further questions or actions you wish taken, please either take it up with an administrator, or at WP:BLPN. I am not an administrator. Neither am I a politician, or even a resident of Florida.

--Manway (talk) 00:03, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Admin

How do I get in contact with an administrator?

Here. WP:List of administrators/Active or you can type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will be in to help you, usually within minutes. --Manway (talk) 20:34, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gamebred Fighting Championship

The article Gamebred Fighting Championship has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:NCORP- the event might be notable, but this isn't inherited by the company.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:52, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gamebred Fighting Championship for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gamebred Fighting Championship is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gamebred Fighting Championship until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

MrsSnoozyTurtle 22:08, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gamebred logo2.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gamebred logo2.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 22:12, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]