User talk:Peterchasefx
August 2009
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Kerner Optical, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Kerner Optical was changed by Peterchasefx (u) (t) deleting 11309 characters on 2009-08-09T17:40:35+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 17:40, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
Sorry... been a long time but the edit was, I believe, relative to removing information that was not about Kerner Optical but, rather, ILM the company that Kerner Optical was spun out from. It was not vandalism; it was removing content that was not applicable. Peterchasefx (talk) 20:47, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
Recent Edits To List of YouTube personalities
[edit]Your edits are appreciated, but there is a major discussion going on in the Talk:List of YouTube personalities regarding Ray William Johnson. Please make sure to check the talk page to see why those references were rejected in the first place and why he hasn't been added. Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it! 06:33, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
- Once again, those articles are not suitable. They don't really go in depth with him. The source is fine, but article isn't. Please don't revert until all the discussion on him has been completed and a suitable article is found. Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it! 13:31, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- I give up... you have an issue with this and you win. I don't really care except that you have degraded the quality of wikipediea. This is NOT an argument of notability, this is a pure and simple list of YouTube Personalities -- which Johnson clearly is. The references -- I only used two -- clearly demonstrate his YouTube popularity/notoriety... they DON'T need to go into depth on him. (THis would, obviously, be a valid argument if we debating creating a page for him.) Peterchasefx (talk) 16:14, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- There are a lot of people who go on YouTube and have never heard of him. People who even help out with that article has never heard of him until they seen the talk page. Being popular on YouTube doesn't make him notable. Popular and notable are two different things. Oh and if you keep on adding him back, you can blocked for a revert war. Leave him off until further notice. Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it! 18:22, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- So can you be blocked -- it is you that is vandalizing Wikipedia and ignoring both the rules and the spirit of Wikipedia Peterchasefx (talk) 22:58, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- There are a lot of people who go on YouTube and have never heard of him. People who even help out with that article has never heard of him until they seen the talk page. Being popular on YouTube doesn't make him notable. Popular and notable are two different things. Oh and if you keep on adding him back, you can blocked for a revert war. Leave him off until further notice. Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it! 18:22, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- I give up... you have an issue with this and you win. I don't really care except that you have degraded the quality of wikipediea. This is NOT an argument of notability, this is a pure and simple list of YouTube Personalities -- which Johnson clearly is. The references -- I only used two -- clearly demonstrate his YouTube popularity/notoriety... they DON'T need to go into depth on him. (THis would, obviously, be a valid argument if we debating creating a page for him.) Peterchasefx (talk) 16:14, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Java-Earthquake2004-University.jpg
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Java-Earthquake2004-University.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 15:28, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
That photograph was taken by Edmeades and shared, with permission to share, in a slideshow on the topic. Peterchasefx (talk) 20:45, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Eric-RedCarpet-K.jpg
[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:Eric-RedCarpet-K.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Citobun (talk) 15:20, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
