User talk:Peter NYC
 | This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics:
|
Quick note
[edit]Hello, thanks for assuming good faith, it didn't occur to me to compare the edit to mobile, and perhaps I jumped the gun. Take a look at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vanillablu, if you haven't already. This sock farm has a history of trolling fat fetishism while being very polite about it and acting confused. Of course this doesn't mean that this another example, but I think it's a strong possibility (it's pretty unusual for an account with only four edits to know where to find an image on Commons, for example). Thanks again. Grayfell (talk) 20:43, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Grayfell:Thanks, I had a look and it showed me that I don't know enough about sockpuppets and sock farms. As for the flag, it is actually used on https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q22905841, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Sexual_identity_symbols, and on https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fettaktivism, and on Commons there is a pretty good description of it, in case you haven't seen it. A quick Google Image Search did not provide a lot of results, but interestingly iStock and other stock image providers have it, or a version of it, listed. I have no dog in this fight, and that's as far as I want to involve myself unless you want me to help Tieher to put the thing up -- I just saw that he asked you for help instead of reading the picture tutorial. <sigh>
- Best wishes, == Peter NYC (talk) 21:50, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- Yeah, I dunno either. Maybe? I think the flag was probably a sincere invention, and seems to have spread around the Internet a bit, but we still need some way to explain it to readers, and that would need a reliable source.
- Other Wikipedia/Wikimedia projects are not reliable sources, per WP:SPS and WP:CIRC. We need to cite sources outside Wikipedia to make sure they are verifiable. Wikipedia:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia are some examples of what goes wrong when we don't do this. Other language Wikipedia's have their own standards, so they might include things that English Wikipedia would not, or it could be that those editors just haven't noticed yet. If they know of a reliable source, I will help them put up the image, unless someone else beats me to it. Grayfell (talk) 22:19, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ITN recognition for Larry McMurtry
[edit]
On 1 April 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Larry McMurtry, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 03:58, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about The Long Shadow (2019 film)
[edit]Hello, Peter NYC, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Devonian Wombat, and I thank you for your contributions.
I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, The Long Shadow (2019 film), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Long Shadow (2019 film).
You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Devonian Wombat}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Devonian Wombat (talk) 02:54, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of The Long Shadow (2019 film) for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Long Shadow (2019 film), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Long Shadow (2019 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2024 (UTC)