User talk:Peterburton

Some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Peter G. Burton may not be sufficiently well-known to merit articles of their own. The Wikipedia community welcomes newcomers, and encourages them to become Wikipedians. On Wikipedia, all users are entitled to a user page in which they can describe themselves, and this article's content may be incorporated into that page. However, to merit inclusion in the encyclopedia proper, a subject must be notable. We encourage you to write or improve articles on notable subjects. Snottygobble 01:44, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

May I direct your attention to Wikipedia:Autobiography? Snottygobble 02:52, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm losing patience with your insistence on posting unverifiable, non-notable material on yourself into Wikipedia. If you continue this way, you may be blocked from editing. Snottygobble 02:57, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the website http:/homepage.mac.com/blinkcentral/ before assuming that the posting is not worthy.

I already have. And I might add that I'm also familiar with the works of Block, Chalmers, Churchland, Damasio, Flanagan, Güzeldere, Searle.... However, we don't judge the merits of your theory/model; we just judge whether it has achieved sufficient prominence to feature on Wikipedia. Snottygobble 03:14, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you have looked at the website, you will see that the first poster 'The Memory Project' is the summary of a paper accepted and presented at the 4th International Conference on Memory (ICOM-4) at UNSW last month. This was the first public outing of the model and its implications, apart from a refereed presentation at the 40th Australian Psychological Society conference in Melbourne, September 2005 (see CV) and published in its Proceedings.

I am presenting a seminar at the University of Melbourne's Melbourne Education Research Unit, hosted by Director Professor Barry McGaw, on 10 August 2006 at which the substance of the second poster 'The Science of the Mind' will be presented.

This pseudo-science and self-promotional material does NOT belong on Wikipedia. Your theories are untested and unsupported. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.217.6.7 (talk) 06:44, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A first scientific specification of human consciousness

A first detailed specification of human consciousness is now lodged on my http://homepage.mac.com/blinkcentral website. There are five distinct articles dealing with various necessary aspects of this problem: 0. 'The Long Search for Aristotle's Soul' (pp18: personal account of this research, claiming solution) I. 'Towards resolving the Mysteries of Consciousness' (pp15: objectives are consciousness & cognition) II. 'Towards a Definition of Pure Consciousness' (pp31:first scientific specification of consciousness) III. 'The Scope of Consciousness' (pp47: analysis of the scope of the experienced content of above) IV. 'Subjective Consciousness' (pp30: incomplete draft of development of the self using MTPP-2006) V. 'Cogno-Dynamics' (pp19: the full specification of the system of directed autonomy of humanoid cognition).

This last article makes it clear that the specification claimed is one agnostic of the individual and personal details of experience, memory, learning and development that comprise the individual and determine personality and intelligence. All these matters are captured in the detailed specification of the templates that are the substantive entities of the Cognitive Process Consciousness model, framework and system. However, the specification of the system behind the regulated state of human consciousness (pure, type I) and the cognitive process organisation that enables the growth of competence(s) on the basis of experience gained which impart capability to act navigationally (consciousness' scope, Type II) is complete to the extent of its general principles of autonomus directed action.

I have set up a discussion group offline from Wikipedia, at WIMTBH at groups.mac.comMedia: groups.mac.com/wimtbh, which you may like to follow or join. [The homepage.mac.com/blinkcentral [1]site has just exceeded 1000 hits.]

Peter Burton 30 October 2006 --pgburton 11:23, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]