User talk:Peter m 2001

Welcome!

Hello, Peter m 2001, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for United Kingdom national debt. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Asteuartw (talk) 10:48, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to United Kingdom national debt may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

more and saving less. (Private Sector Surplus = Government Deficit – External Deficit)<ref>[http://heteconomist.com/what-everyone-should-know-about-budget-deficits-and-public-debt/ What

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:59, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot

Hi Peter m 2001! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Writ Keeper (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:41, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

United Kingdom National Debt

Peter m 2001, at the very least you need to explain your edits. Every time you make an edit, you should say what it is you are doing and why. Many of your recent edits do not belong on the page, rather they should be added here: History of the British national debt. ----Asteuartw (talk) 11:04, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The comments are pertinent to the ND as it is - not as it was historically. The edits are referenced are should be self explanatory. Which one would you say needs the most additional explanation? I'm happy to discuss further. Peter m 2001 (talk) 11:48, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]