User talk:Peter Konnecke

Welcome

Hello Peter Konnecke,

Welcome and enjoy Wikipedia. Your edits are much appreciated.

These links might help you with your contributions:

For Wikipedia-wide involvement, visit the Community Portal and the Village Pump.

Be sure to check out Australian resources, like The Australia Wikiportal, Australian Wikipedians' Notice Board, Australian Collaboration of the Fortnight, New Australian Articles and Australian stub articles.

By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Preferably, use four tildes (~~~~), which produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page.

Again, welcome.--Cyberjunkie | Talk 06:23, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Beacon Hill, New South Wales, Warringah Road

Beacon Hill, New South Wales, Warringah Road Does every street in your suburb need its own article? --Gaff ^talk 02:33, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The main reason for adding street pages to my suburb article is to create community. I am publicly proposing that members of our local community participate in this Wiki project so they can add thier collective knowledge of the history of thier street.

From my experience, every street has it's history, as does every family and I think this project provides the mechanism for them to document that. This ranges from previous property owners to various events. I feel this can be helpful especially in researching family history.

On the other hand, I think your point of view might be that it's important to conserve articles so that they can be managed properly. I agree, conserving space and promoting managability is important, however, the alternative might be to have a whole lot of sub-headings within the main article and make the article very long. This has an effect on the usability of an online document in my opinion.

I welcome your comments and look forward to your reply. Peter Konnecke 02:50, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I think a good strategy might be this: begin with a "main article" that you can already add content to. Let it have sections for various neighborhoods, streets, etc. As those sections get bigger and the article becomes less mangagable, it's pretty easy for large sections to split off into separate articles. It's a nice kind of organic process, that happens all the time in Wikipedia. That might be preferable to creating a lot of empty articles that have to wait around for someone to add content.

Whether or not you decide to do that, I want to let you know about stub categories. There's a project going on to organize stubs according to their topic, so people can find them more easily. Rather than putting the {{stub}} template on articles, you can use more specific ones, like {{NewSouthWales-geo-stub}}. You can find an organized list of all the various stub types here.

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for your contributions! GTBacchus 02:56, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Peter. Welcome. I admire your efforts towards building community. I'm not sure how likely the editors here at wikipedia will be at leaving your pages alone. The issue will be playing itself out on the Articles for deletion page for the time being. (By the way, don't take down any of the ugly looking tags that get put up or you might wind up causing more harm than good for your proposal). I thought that maybe blogger would be a good thing for you to consider. There, you could get all the families in your neighborhood set up with their own blog to post photos and stories and all the goings on that are important on a small scale but perhaps not of substantial importance to be in an encyclopedia. Best of luck! --Gaff ^talk 03:03, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I dont think blogs are the way to go on this because of thier "bad name" whereas Wikipedia has a great name and citing it as a resource in research is a much better thing than citing a blog. I'm re-thinking on how I do this now. I'm convinced :-) How do I delete the street pages that I've created. Peter Konnecke 03:16, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

There's not really anything you need to do to delete them. The appropriate wheels are already in motion - see the discussion here, in which you may want to participate. GTBacchus 04:09, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have now voted to delete my own articles, in order to keep the peace. Peter Konnecke 04:36, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Peter,

I voted delete for the street names in Beacon Hill as there were of local interest only. However, I think that there is great scope for you to work on developing the Beacon Hill, New South Wales article. An example of a good article on a suburb is the article on Yarralumla, Australian Capital Territory. However, don't get discouraged and keep up the good work. Capitalistroadster 06:54, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I kept the Beacon Hill, New South Wales article. I hope to breathe more life into it soon. Thank you for your encouragement Capitalistroadster - Peter Konnecke 07:15, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of city features

Re your question on AfD about what level of detail is appropriate for city features -- in my experience (that is, not necessarily by policy, but by what I've seen survive AfD), articles about neighbourhoods are about as tight as it gets unless the street is particulary notable on historical or tourism grounds (Times Square, Rodeo Drive, Sussex Drive). As an example, Preston Street (Ottawa) was heading for deletion but as Little Italy, Ottawa it was easily kept.

I hope you're not put off by the result and want to stick around! — mendel ☎ 04:54, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Mendel - I'll keep that in mind. Thanks you for explaining this in a more practical sense. I appreciate your comments. Peter Konnecke 05:05, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

As several of us mentioned, there is no issue with adding street-level details to an existing article for a city/neighborhood, but rarely will a street be notable enough to garner its own article. There is a section at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Precedents (See Remarks on Notability) that addresses this. Mendel's suggestion regarding naming of a district might be a good idea, if all of these streets are in the same area of town -- something like Historic Beacon Hill, New South Wales still might have to suffer through an afd, but it would stand a much better chance of surviving. - Neier 14:09, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Street names

Actually, I think that it would be very cool to have street names for a suburb. Every council should have a town planner that gives the history of the names... my only suggestion would be to create an article List of streets in Strathfield (for instance), something like this:

Redmyre Street: the name originally came from the original Redmyre Estate that existed before Strathfield was proclaimed (see the birth of Strathfield). The street was named by such and such on such and such date.

What do you think? - Ta bu shi da yu 11:30, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

That was kinda of the path I was trying to go down but it seems it not supposed to work that way. Still it might be okay to add this as a section is the main document. Peter Konnecke 12:55, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Forgot to add...

... great work! I am so encouraged to see people contributing to suburb articles! Especially someone as diligent as yourself. That's what I love about this project: people are contributing to something great for the good of others! You are to be congratulated on the work that you're doing... - Ta bu shi da yu 11:34, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Ta' - will keep going .... want to get this one down pat and then can look at a few others. I modelled this on the successful Summer Hill article. - Peter Konnecke 12:56, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Olympics WikiProject membership update

The Olympics WikiProject is performing a membership update to check for currently active and idle members.

Because your username appears on the members list, we kindly ask you visit this page and put your name under the appropriate section, using the code #{{user|USERNAME}}, in order to renew or cancel your membership.

The Olympics WikiProject team

Jimbo is coming to Sydney

Sorry to spam you if you aren't interested. See Wikipedia:Meetup/Sydney#April 25th for more info if you are interested. - Ta bu shi da yu 08:39, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Beacon Hill Bushfire Brigade

A tag has been placed on Beacon Hill Bushfire Brigade, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Mattinbgn\^talk 01:09, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Olympic Summer Games

I would suggest that you shouldn't go changing the wording of all the articles in the way you did at 2000 Summer Olympics until a consensus has been reached at wikiproject olympics.Please give other users a chance to voice their opinions first. Basement12 (T.C) 03:01, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sydney meetup

Hi, I got your name from this list, and thought you might be interested in a meetup in Sydney at the Alexandria Hotel tomorrow. I hope you can join us. Sorry for the late notice. --99of9 (talk) 11:12, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Wikimedians to the Olympic Games

Hi. I am part of an effort to get Wikimedians access to the 2016 Summer Olympics as accredited reporters and photographers. Part of this effort includes covering the 2012 Summer Paralympics. Two Wikimedians have credentials to attend these games as reporters through Wikimedia Australia. As English Wikipedia does not allow original reporting, this is largely through Wikinews with a project page found at Wikinews:Paralympic Games. If you are interested in helping to get Wikimedians to the next Summer Olympics,I'd encourage you to assist with Wikinews efforts, and also to work on all language 2012 Summer Paralympic Wikipedia articles before, during and after the Games to demonstrate a track record of success. Thank you. --LauraHale (talk) 04:27, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sydney edit-a-thon invitation

Sydney Meetup
Next: 13 October 2012
Last: 23 July 2012

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a classical music edit-a-thon Saturday week (13 October) in Sydney. The theme will be Music of France, to coincide with the ABC Classic FM countdown between 8-14 October. If you are unable to attend in person, we will also be collaborating online during the countdown. Details an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Sydney/October 2012. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 09:36, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Sydney)

Sydney edit-a-thon invitation

Sydney Meetup
Next: 10 November 2012
Last: 13 October 2012

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a disability edit-a-thon Saturday week (10 November) in Sydney. If you are unable to attend in person, we will also be collaborating online before, during and after the meetup. Details an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Sydney/November 2012. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 15:17, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Sydney)

Sydney meetup invitation: January 2013

Sydney Meetup
Next: 10 January 2013
Last: November 2012

Hi there! You are cordially invited to attend a meetup being held on Thursday 10 January 2013. Details an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Sydney/January 2013. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 09:56, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Sydney)

Sydney September 2013 edit-a-thon invite

Sydney Meetup
Next: 21 September 2013
Last: Higher Ed Symposium

Hi there! You are cordially invited to an edit-a-thon this Saturday (21 September) in Sydney at the State Library of New South Wales (SLNSW), where you can collaborate with other Wikipedians throughout the day. Andy Carr, a senior librarian at SLNSW will also be helping out. The theme of the edit-a-thon is paralympics sports, but you are free to come along to meet other wiki contributors, and edit other topics.

If you are unable to attend in person, we will also be collaborating online. Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Sydney/September 2013. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 09:38, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Wikipedians in Sydney)

Fair Use in Australia discussion

As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Peter Konnecke. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]