User talk:Peter IBM

You have no right passing images created by others as your own. Dahn 17:51, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you refer to the pictures that I've uploaded, don't worry I made them when I was in Romania. --Peter IBM 18:15, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So you travelled all over Romania (Brasov, Iasi, Mamaia, the Danube Delta, etc) and took low-resolution pictures from helicopters and whatnot? Dahn 19:19, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I made them to look like that, and low-resolution pictures are needed here.--Peter IBM 06:12, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, actually, it is recommended to upload higher-resolution pictures, (see the Image policy: "Upload a high-resolution version of your image whenever possible"). For the computer screens, low resolution images are ok, but when trying to print them, they won't look as good. (At some point in the future, Wikipedia might have a print edition.) bogdan 11:25, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't it funny that your picture of Mamaia is the same as the one in here: http://www.eurosion.org/shoreline/45mamaia.jpg ? I mean, even the cars are parked in the same places! :-) bogdan 11:31, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

they must have stolen from me --Peter IBM 11:40, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

what about these:

bogdan 12:00, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, again. I have deleted the images as copyright violations. bogdan 17:24, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stop removing the noncompliant tag

The title "Life of Mircea Eliade" isn't properly encyclopedic; the article doesn't establish who Eliade is, and some of the text reads in a POV fashion. Part of the problem is that this entire article is a cut and pasted chunk taken out of context from Mircea Eliade. Furthermore, there were no references attached to the source citations when I originally placed the tag, and the ones we have now are practically useless ("Ornea, p.150-151" - what the heck is that?) wikipediatrix 17:10, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. —Khoikhoi 20:01, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]