User talk:Peter7777ab

January 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Stockholm Olympic Stadium, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 16:59, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Paul is dead have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Paul is dead was changed by Peter7777ab (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.896285 on 2021-07-25T14:43:41+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:43, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Paul is dead, you may be blocked from editing. JG66 (talk) 14:55, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Paul is dead. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ... discospinster _talk 15:03, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Paul is dead‎‎. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 15:47, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 16:11, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]