User talk:Peteerh

Hello, Peteerh! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! 76.65.128.43 (talk) 17:28, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Welcome!

Hello, Peteerh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Jason Ewing, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! – Richard BB 16:49, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jason Ewing

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jason Ewing requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. – Richard BB 16:49, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. While everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one of your recent file uploads, such as Pamela Barnes, had missing or false information regarding its source and copyright status. Please note that Wikipedia takes copyright and copyright infringement very seriously. Images and other media may only be uploaded and included if their copyright status meets the conditions stated in our image use policy, and if their provenance is clearly documented. If you have questions, feel free to ask at the copyright question page or on my talk page. Thank you. HorrorFan121 (talk) 17:53, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rebecca Wentworth for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rebecca Wentworth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebecca Wentworth until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Egeymi (talk) 22:25, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not continue to upload files with missing or false information on their copyright status. Please note that Wikipedia takes copyright and copyright infringement very seriously. Images and other media may only be uploaded and included if they meet the conditions stated in our image use policy, and if their provenance is clearly documented. If you have questions, feel free to ask at the copyright question page or on my talk page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 23:55, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jamie Ewing

The article Jamie Ewing has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:N - no mention of notability, nonnotable secondary TV soap opera character

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 76.65.128.43 (talk) 07:10, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Maggie Barnes (Dallas)

The article Maggie Barnes (Dallas) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:N - no mention of notability; nonnotable secondary TV soap opera character

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 76.65.128.43 (talk)

Proposed deletion of Rebecca Barnes Wentworth (Dallas)

The article Rebecca Barnes Wentworth (Dallas) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:N - no mention of notability -- nonnotable secondary TV soap opera character

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 76.65.128.43 (talk) 07:10, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Katherine Wentworth

The article Katherine Wentworth has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:N nonnotable secondary TV soap opera character

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 76.65.128.43 (talk) 09:26, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Jamie Ewing (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Southfork

Maggie Barnes (Dallas) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sarah Cunningham

Mark Graison (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to John Beck

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:06, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Rebecca Barnes Wentworth (Dallas) with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Tgeairn (talk) 21:24, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rebecca Barnes Wentworth (Dallas) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rebecca Barnes Wentworth (Dallas) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebecca Barnes Wentworth (Dallas) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Egeymi (talk) 21:31, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Rebecca Barnes Wentworth (Dallas). - Happysailor ^(Talk) 21:38, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Victoriaprincipal1.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Victoriaprincipal1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:19, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:300px-Aunt.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:300px-Aunt.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:19, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Katherine Wentworth

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Katherine Wentworth requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. 76.65.128.43 (talk) 06:35, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jamie Ewing

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jamie Ewing requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. 76.65.128.43 (talk) 06:35, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Victoriaprincipal2.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Victoriaprincipal2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:17, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removing AfD template

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Rebecca Barnes Wentworth (Dallas). Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot t • c » 21:54, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

Hello, I'm 76.65.128.43. I removed an edit that you recently made to Jamie Ewing that seemed to be a test. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- 76.65.128.43 (talk) 12:12, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rebecca Barnes Wentworth (Dallas). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- 76.65.128.43 (talk) 12:13, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Cally Harper Ewing. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. -- 76.65.128.43 (talk) 17:24, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Jamie Ewing, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- 76.65.128.43 (talk) 06:26, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Cally Harper Ewing, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- 76.65.128.43 (talk) 06:26, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you upload a media file with false or missing copyright or source information, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:40, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Infobox soap character 2/doc, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- 76.65.128.43 (talk) 06:57, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removing AfD template

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Rebecca Barnes Wentworth (Dallas). Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot t • c » 23:54, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —Darkwind (talk) 07:54, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2013 January

Hello, I'm 76.65.128.43. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Valene Ewing because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please do not make nonsense additions such as a birthdate of "111" as you did with this edit -- 76.65.128.43 (talk) 07:24, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bobby Ewing. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Please don't vandalously change Bobby Ewing into JR Ewing and back again, and hide it into the edit history as you did with these edits:[1][2] -- 76.65.128.43 (talk) 01:40, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rebecca Barnes, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not add nonsense to articles as you did with this edit [3] -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 06:14, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rebecca Barnes, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Do not remove references as you did with this edit [4] -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 01:50, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rebecca Barnes Wentworth (Dallas), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 01:51, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bobby Ewing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ann Ewing (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text

{{unblock|reason=I edited too much and I created another account, I was a fool, and I'm really sorry, does not occur more than once! You can unblock me? Thanks!}}

, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Yunshui 雲‍水 10:56, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Priscillapointer.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Priscillapointer.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:11, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

user:Peter9709

Are you the same person as Peter9709 (talk · contribs) ? -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 16:56, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 17:26, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for attempting to evade your previous block by continuing to edit as Peter9709 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text

{{unblock|reason=I edited too much and I created another account, I was a fool, and I'm really sorry, does not occur more than once! You can unblock me? Thanks!}}

, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Sandstein 21:44, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Peteerh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I edited too much and I created another account, I was a fool, and I'm really sorry, does not occur more than once! You can unblock me? Thanks!

Decline reason:

You have been blocked several times for disruptive editing and then tried to evade your block. I see no evidence in your unblock request that your behavior will change. With that understanding, I think Sandstein's one-month block is more than appropriate. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 18:31, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

View from 65.92.180.137 (talk) Peteerh is still in the 2-week block period for disruptive editing. Peteerh was also blocked for disruptive editing prior to the 2-week block, so this is the third block (two concurrent blocks: 1st-disruptive (2wk), 2nd-block evasion (1mo) ). I don't think a lifting of the block is appropriate. At the very least, I think he should serve out the 2-week period for disruptive editing he got after repeating the behavior he got for his initial 36-hour block. Until this block, he's never responded to any of the warning, or participate in the AFD that he repeatedly removed from the article he created. Lack of prior participatory actions and block evasion with a second account would make it seem that keeping at the least, the 2week block in place as a good idea. -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 09:00, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I do not wish to appear dismissive, but as admins we can decide on the best procedure without additional guidance. Thank you. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 11:18, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, no problem. -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 13:53, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013

This is your last warning. The next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Pam Ewing, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Rain the 1 01:31, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefintiely

I have blocked your account until such time as you agree to use the consensus-based process for requesting page moves rather than repeatedly moving pages despite the objections of other editors and getting into move wars, which are extremely disruptive. If or when you are ready to use the proper process, add {{unblock}} below this message, using the "reason" field to convince us that unblocking you would not lead to further disruption. Be aware that if you evade this block by crating another account, your edits will be removed on sight and your chances of being unblocked on this account will be drastically reduced. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:21, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Peteerh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Good afternoon! I'm ready to use the proper process, I was a fool, and I'm really sorry, does not occur more than once! I apologize for the inconveniences! Thank you for listening and I hope you'll unblock me!

Decline reason:

"I was a fool, and I'm really sorry, does not occur more than once!". I think I've seen that somewhere before. Try coming up with a good reason why we should trust you. Peridon (talk) 20:32, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.