User talk:Petecater

Deletion discussion about Amanda Eliasch

Hello, Petecater,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Amanda Eliasch should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amanda Eliasch .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, scope_creep 20:56, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Petecater! Thank you for your contributions. I am Mabalu and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Mabalu (talk) 02:17, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Petecater! I think the Amanda Eliasch article is a good first attempt - it just needs tweaking and style edits and some extra work on it. I'm sorry that your first experience with Wikipedia has gone like this, and hope it won't put you off contributing. Mabalu (talk) 02:19, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Amanda Eliasch may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

photographer, who lives in the historical part of [[Cheyne Walk]], London.<ref>name="STimes2013">[http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/style/homes_and_gardens/My_Place/article1236747.ece
*2011 ''Peccadillioes'',<ref>{{cite web|url=http://[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/07/16/amanda-eliasch-peccadillo_n_896597.html#s307575 |title='

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:41, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 15 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Amanda Eliasch page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Sedamjedan (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:11, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]