User talk:Pete fa brown

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pete fa brown (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This user Mr. Mifter is a basis FBI person and is violating the US Constution. I have not done any thing wrong.

Decline reason:

This is the most bizarre - and utterly implausible - unblock request I've ever looked at. However, this unblock request does not address your block. —Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Boribori!)} 06:42, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pete fa brown (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

please explain why I am being blocked?

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Sandstein 11:36, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

My guess is you are blocked because of this partisan conspiracy screed you kept posting. Wikipedia is not the place to call people to action, disseminate conspiracy theories, or attempt to persuade people towards your political position. —Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Boribori!)} 06:56, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pete fa brown (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the editor is right I have seen the the lord and I will correct my ways. I am so sorry that I have failed but I am only a human. I will assume only good faith inthe future. I know that diabolical conspiracy. Peace and love. I was blind and now I can see. The world is flat and I must follow blindly and tell all the children.

Decline reason:

Agree with below comment by User:Jéské Couriano. Cirt (talk) 10:33, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sarcasm isn't gonna help you. :| —Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Boribori!)} 09:16, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]