User talk:Pete G.

Just in case you don't spot my edit, I think you may have got one of your document references wrong in Project Habakkuk. The online catalogue of the National Archives doesn't recognise PREM 2/216/4, there is however a PREM 3/216/5 which looks as if it might be the right one. David Underdown 14:53, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pykrete

Just a quick query regarding your revert of Pykrete to a 2006 edit - You said to see Talk regarding this edit however I cannot find any reference to the reasoning behind such a reason on either the article's talk page or your own user talk page. Can you please elaborate on why a revert back to an edit from 2006 was necessary? Kipoc (talk) 02:03, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Did you by chance post this while I was actually editing the Talk:Pykrete page? I give brief reasons there, but I'm willing to discuss in more detail if you wish. Pete G. (talk) 02:20, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aye, I obviously did - Thought I'd waited for enough time, but was still preemptive! Sorry to bother! Kipoc (talk) 02:44, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]