User talk:Petarbosnicpetrus

Welcome!

Hello, Petarbosnicpetrus, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Gravifugal force, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kolbasz (talk) 15:32, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gravifugal force

The article Gravifugal force has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable neologism and fringe physics concept coined by the article's creator.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kolbasz (talk) 15:32, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Gravifugal force

Hello, and thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to the Gravifugal force article. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 22:44, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. BollyJeff | talk 15:09, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Category:Levitation. DVdm (talk) 10:47, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I have not seen these warnings. When I saw it I have deleted my contribution.--Petarbosnicpetrus (talk) 11:00, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I hope this is not violence. I just want to show you the content of scientific article about levitation an article suitable to some encyclopedia or wikipedia. I also hope you will put, add this link into your article "Levitation": http://petarbosnicpetrus.wordpress.com/2014/06/04/levitation/--Petarbosnicpetrus (talk) 08:26, 6 June 2014 (UTC) There is some problem with the link, maybe this one is functioning . http://petarbosnicpetrus.wordpress.com/--Petarbosnicpetrus (talk) 08:39, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See our policies about wp:original research, wp:reliable sources, wp:secondary sources, and also wp:FRINGE. - DVdm (talk) 09:03, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your sugestion.--Petarbosnicpetrus (talk) 09:28, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]