User talk:PetaRZ

Welcome!

Hello, PetaRZ, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me or a helper Commander Keane on our talk page. Again, welcome!

If you want to tell me something or if you just want to say hi, leave your message under the Talk Section of | My Talk Page

Ω Anonymous anonymous Ψ: ''Have A Nice Day'' 12:43, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Zvezdno Obshtestvo Observatory

I have removed Zvezdno Obshtestvo Observatory from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2007 May 22. If you wish to nominate an article for deletion, please read the proper way to do so at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion#How to list pages for deletion. A ecis^Brievenbus 19:10, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'll repeat the procedure, firmly following the rules. PetaRZ 19:17, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you need any help, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. A ecis^Brievenbus 19:20, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, if I encounter any problem, I'll ask you. PetaRZ 19:21, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Let me know if did something wrong, but I think that now it's O.K. PetaRZ 19:29, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's ok this time :) A ecis^Brievenbus 00:51, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kirlian photography. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ~Amatulić (talk) 14:09, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In looking over the talk page comments, there seems to be a misperception about PhD dissertations; WP:RS does state that they are considered reliable sources. They are essentially peer-reviewed publications. ~Amatulić (talk) 14:25, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There isn't any edit war; did you check the talk page? MrX who reverted my last edit finally agreed that the content should be removed. Between my two last edits, even though they look the same, a consensus has been reached. Also, I didn't challenge the fact that a PhD thesis is a peer-reviewed publication, I only pointed out the fact that it is a primary source, par excellence. The lack of secondary sources reviewing the importance of this particular publication shows that probably it's not worthy for inclusion in Wikipedia, for more details please look up the talk page. −PetaRZ (talk) 16:37, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for the template message. I saw the revision history of the page and noted you removed sourced content 3 times, and that there was controversy on the talk page about its inclusion. I didn't see a real consensus, although I did note you acknowledged in your edit summary that the consensus may be difficult to discern. Feel free to delete this section from your talk page. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:31, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please apologize you too, I should have explained more carefully why I removed this content. As I explained in the summary, User:Mbreht is not hearing any arguments and it's difficult to discern the consensus mainly because of his, sometimes incomprehensible, input. A newly registered editor joined the discussion and is discussing in the same style. For me it's an obvious case of promoting original research: all references are primary sources. I would not object any inclusion of material, as far as accessible reviews of this research can be found and cited here. −PetaRZ (talk) 18:38, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Varna International Ballet Competition, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page José Carlos Martinez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:13, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, PetaRZ. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, PetaRZ. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]