User talk:Person1428/Butterworth v Smith

Peer Review

So far your article looks great, I really like how organized it is and how almost every section at least has something. The factual part of your article is very interesting and it is well written. I wouldn't have even thought to do a factual section in our article. Your article doesn't feel like it is taking a side at all which is also good. Also your two sources look good. Two things that I would say you could improve are one putting things in the two sections that are blank, but I think you know that. I would also say that some of the legal section feels like it should be part of the background section instead. Overall your article is very well written and it very easy to understand what you are trying to convey to the audience. Great Work! BLamm6 (talk) 18:12, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for you analysis on our page, we are working on filling in those last two sections. I will review out legal section and see if anything can be moved to background. (Person1428 (talk) 20:49, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We appreciate your recommendations and will take them into consideration when moving forward with our article.Thank you! 132.178.207.26 (talk) 17:25, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]