User talk:Perplexed12

In response to your feedback

Hi Perplexed... I looked at the article and removed the tag. There are many references now. Great work!

Wikipelli ^Talk 12:45, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded a photo of Bill O'Neill taken this morning. I see it made it to Wikipedia Commons but how do I get to use it to replace the older photograph currently used in Bill O'Neill (media)? (Perplexed12 (talk) 18:13, 4 July 2014 (UTC))[reply]

Help me!

{{help me}}

Please help me with...This morning, July 4, I uploaded a photo of Bill O'Neill taken this morning to replace the older photo on the page dealing with him -- Bill O'Neill (media). The photo made it Wikipedia Commons but I don't know how to load it on to the bio page. How do I do this? Perplexed12 (talk) 22:43, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Perplexed12 (talk) 22:43, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Picture tutorial - but not for those infoboxes at the top right of most articles - there you just add the name after the "image=" parameter (and leave out the "file": part. The one currently on the page was coded all wrong, so I've fixed it. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 00:35, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Bill O'Neill in 2015.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Bill O'Neill in 2015.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:05, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Perplexed12/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 04:50, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Perplexed12, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 04:50, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Reginald Newton, from its old location at User:Perplexed12/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 12:48, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Reginald Newton has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Reginald Newton. Thanks! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:23, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Constructing references

Hi. You seem to be having difficulty constructing references. I have been fixing these for you so far, but it would be better if you learned how to do it for yourself. At the start of the reference you need <ref> and at the end you need </ref>. Note that there is a forward slash in the closing tag, but not one in the opening tag. Please read WP:REFBEGIN for more information on how to construct references, and please consider using one of the toolbar-based ways of automatically inserting references which are quicker, easier and better than doing it manually. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 12:15, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Reginald Newton has been accepted

Reginald Newton, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:05, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Perplexed12. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Perplexed12. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]