User talk:Permaculture design

August 2013

Hello, I'm EricEnfermeroMobile. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. EricEnfermeroMobile (talk) 22:51, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. EricEnfermeroMobile (talk) 17:03, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Permaculture design, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Permaculture design! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:18, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Permaculture design, and welcome to Wikipedia!
Thank you for registering an account.
I hope you like the place and decide to stay.


	Introduction 5 The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help Tips	How to write a great article Manual of Style Be Bold Assume Good faith Get adopted

If you need help, ask me on my talk page, or get instant online help at IRC.
You can also place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will come shortly to answer your questions.

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:29, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

People in permaculture

Please consider expanding it, cleaning it up, sourcing it, adding categories, etc. As it stand, it may be proposed for a merger into Permaculture, and that procedure is a bit of a time-consuming nuisance. Best wishes, and welcome. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:36, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Here's an idea you might like:

You are really the sole author of People in permaculture. That means you can copy paste the content into a section within Permaculture (please say in the edit summary "ATTRIBUTION: COPIED FROM People in permaculture"). Then we can delete People in permaculture, for now.

Normally, I wouldn't recommend this. But in this case, I think it may be a good plan. Why? Because at Permaculture it will get a lot of attention. That article gets 1,000 page visits a day, whereas People in permaculture gets around 4 page visits a day. So, as a section within Permaculture, it will have a chance to grow quickly, and then break away naturally when mature. This is good for the development of the article, will give it more exposure, and will serve visitors well. What do you think? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:01, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Message

Hello. You have a new message at Anna Frodesiak's talk page. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:01, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

People in permaculture

I plan to take some sort of action about that article soon. It's been unsourced for ages, is a violation of Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons, and has been in terrible shape. You didn't respond to my merger suggestion. I'd suggest that you source it well right away or will face possible deletion. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 05:27, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]