User talk:Perko92

Welcome!

Hello, Perko92, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 18:47, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Petar Segrt

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Petar Segrt. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I already did it, thanks for letting me know! Perko92 (talk) 04:47, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ilija Spasojević

Hi Perko, listen, you can´t just remove a tag asking for sources and leaving only one source in a article where many information is unsourced. That is why you need to have a number of general websites where the career of the player is numbered (exemples: Playerhistory, Transfermarkt, National-football-teams, etc.) and even then, from what I see, you still have a number of parts of the text that continue being unsourced. Another thisng is that Wikipedia is not a propagandistic website, meaning, we are not having the goal of writting all positive about a person and add all his videos of best goals and so. You tubve videos are not even considered a source. Please read: WP:Sources. I´ll try to help you a bit on the article, but it should be you that in case of wanting to edit articles, you need to get familiarised with WP:Policies. Best regards, FkpCascais (talk) 23:07, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I will make some changes. Thanks, best regards, Perko92 (talk) 07:27, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, but please, see also page history, and if you notece, user Soccer-hollic left you a note that the way you wrote the article you need more in-line sources, exemple, first paragraph: "...Spasojević can be described as an old fashioned English-style centre forward due to his physical presence and great aerial ability.", says who? I´m not against it, I need you to understand that, I even appreciate him and I remember him from the time he spent in Serbia, but anyway, that kind of words are just not appropriate for the encyclopedia style. Try to see other players articles and I beleave you will understand what I am saying. You need to remove the propagandistic tone of the text. You speak of him as if you were selling him, and that is not how the wikipedia article should sound. I´ll try to help you more on this tomorow, in the meantime, check also this important link that shows how a player article should look: Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Players. Then you can see articles like Edin Džeko for exemple. FkpCascais (talk) 07:15, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, i also apreciate him very much and i follow his carrier from some time ago. But also, I understand what you are talking about, i was maybe too propagandistic. I will remove that, thanks for explaining. Best regards, FkpCascais (talk) 11:25, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Talk:Bok Jun Hee with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -down load ׀ talk 05:18, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bok Jun Hee

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Bok Jun Hee. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bok Jun Hee

The article Bok Jun Hee has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 19:13, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bok Jun Hee

The article Bok Jun Hee has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:33, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mirko Spasojević

The article Mirko Spasojević has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 04:44, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mirko Spasojević, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Montenegrins (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mirko Spasojević for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mirko Spasojević is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mirko Spasojević until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:52, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mr Sir Sputnik! Can you please explain to me why is article Mirko Spasojevic nominated for deletion, when I already put references from truthworthy sourses. He is football player from Montenegro, as you can see in many wreferences I put in.

One other thing, Mirko is not actually my cousin like family, but I wrote that so that wikipedia can trust that I am highly knowledgeable about his article, because I am also Montenegrin and I also play part-time football. Thanks and sorry if I disturb you. Perko92 (talk) 04:54, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:The photo of my former coach.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:The photo of my former coach.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:05, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:My own work.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:My own work.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 20:23, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:My own work2.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:My own work2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 20:25, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

Please do not continue to upload files with missing or false information on their copyright status, as you did with File:My own work2.jpg. Please note that Wikipedia takes copyright and copyright infringement very seriously. Images and other media may only be uploaded and included if they meet the conditions stated in our image use policy, and if their provenance is clearly documented. If you have questions, feel free to ask at the copyright question page or on my talk page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 20:26, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:The photo of my former coach.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:The photo of my former coach.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 20:28, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:My own work2.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:My own work2.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 20:43, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Mirko Spasojević. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:54, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Sir Sputnik for informing me. But isn't it written that if I input reliable sourses and refferences I can remove Articles for deletion notices? Sorry If I misunderstood, my english is not that great, so I probably misread that. Sorry for bothering and thanks. Perko92 (talk) 13:22, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Perko92. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Mirko Spasojević, you may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 21:01, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Eeekster! Thanks for letting me know, but I am not in familiar connection with Mirko Spasojević because my surname is Perkovic, but we are the same nationality (Montenegro). I put in "edit summary" that he is my cousin because I wanted that administrator knows that I am knowledgeable to edit this page. That was my mistake, I apologize. I also want to inform you that I am very careful about ensuring my edits are verified by reliable sources. Thanks. Perko92 (talk) 13:22, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:22, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]