User talk:Peripitus/Archive2

Thank you

Thank you also for reverting vandalism on my talk page back in June (I only just noticed you did it).

--Iain4724 18:21, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

ありがとう

ありがとうPeripitus。お元気で12:39, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

T.Mariappa

FYI - I deprodded - CrazyRussian talk/email 14:20, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for reverting vandalism to my userpage yesterday :) Jacek Kendysz 15:03, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Phil Collins

Thankyou for your polite and informative response. I think the time has come for me to get a username here. Maybe then people will stop accusing me of 'vandalism' so often. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.21.148.134 (talk • contribs) 07:48, 13 July 2006.
answered on users talk page --Peripitus (Talk) 08:09, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Moviefan

Eep. Thanks for pointing this out. Jackp said he had created a new account entitled "Moviefan". A closer look at the new user log reveals that he actually created User:Movie-lover. I've fixed the block. Rebecca 11:19, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Wake Forest

the article Four Years at Wake Forest is my own description of Wake Forest based on my experience there. I never knew it was in the student handbook. The handbook is pretty big and obvioulsy we don't read every single page. Please unmark it for delation. I am adding a reference saying that its written by a anonymous student..—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Charhally (talk • contribs) 17:12, 15 July 2006.

Thankyou

Thankyou for giving me those links im sure they will come in handy, the page i made may be deleted, it has no reason to be noted, its just a clan that im in, and i thought it was a good idea to create it, anyway thanks again—The preceding unsigned comment was added by J104 (talk • contribs) 22:48, 16 July 2006 .

Habbo Hotel

Thanks for your help in the Habbo Hotel article. You got to the vandalism quicker than I could :) Seicer (talk) 12:12, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Sorry

Hello Peripitus, Thank you for your comment. My external linking was made out of ignorance, and with no intention of spamming. After reading Wikipedia's rules of external linking I understood my mistake and stopped immediately. Please accept my sincere apology to you and all Wikipedians. I respect this project very much and turn to it from time to time in my research.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Marron 3 (talk • contribs) 00:54, 18 July 2006.

Hi, Think nothing of it and thanks for the friendly note !. The rules and conventions here take a while to get your head around but it all makes sense eventually. Don't let the messages I sent sour you to this place - it can be very fun - and thanks for creating an account ! Happy editing - Peripitus (Talk) 21:32, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

HALLELUJAH!!

Acctually, it is true that "hallelujah" is used, repeatedly so, to mock and/or provoke certain persons, statements and/or religions. The very fact that you called it "vandalism" was proof enough that you feldt offended by it, and that way further proved my theory... If you could kindly reattach my "vandalism" to Hallelujah's history (I'd hate to do it again), with or without the bad grammars, I would kindly overlook your narrowness for this once and, from me to you: HALLELUJAH!! (<Note that I'm mocking you with this statement *grins*)

PS. I'm neither unfair nor negative... I'm just suporting the fact that, the truth should be shown to the public for what it is, with it's entire hideous revelation. Don't try to hide the fact that the truth is a rather hideous thing. ('I', myself, should be proof enough to that.)—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 217.208.25.18 (talk • contribs) 21:09, 18 July 2006.

True ? Possibly, but your text Hallelujah" is also, frequently, used to mock or provoke said religions (the fact that this is the 10th time i write this should be proof enough that it works). does not belong in an encyclopediac article. You've added this many times and had at least five different editors remove it. Can you please read the section on verifyability, reliable sources and consensus. Unless you can source the edit and write in a neutral way it will be quickly removed by other editors again and again and again etc... - Peripitus (Talk) 12:05, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Guess I can't really deny that fact... Okay, you win. But don't you dare deny the fact that 'hallelujah' IS frequently used in a mocking manner. Just one example of that statement would be the worms games' "Concrete Donkey" weapon.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 217.208.25.18 (talk • contribs) 06:43, 19 July 2006.

Thanks!

Thanks for reverting vandalism to my userpage and especially for updating my vandalism count! You went above and beyond to help out. -- Dcflyer 13:05, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

My RfA thanks

Hello Peripitus/Archive2, and thank you for your strong support at my Request for Adminship, which succeeded with an overwhelming final count of (105/2/0). I was very pleased with the outpouring of kind words from the community that has now entrusted me with these tools, from the classroom, the lesson in human psychology and the international resource known as Wikipedia. The Free Encyclopedia. Please feel free to leave me plenty of requests, monitor my actions (through the admin desk on my userpage) and, if you find yourself in the mood, listen to some of what I do in real life. In any case, keep up the great work and have a fabulous day. Grandmasterka 05:48, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

I have a question

I'm only asking you because you've been very helpful to me in the past. My question is...where can I find a list of icons that I can place on my homepage. For example...http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Rambone, I copy and pasted one of them from someone elses page. I have no idea how many different icons there are. I figure there's a list of them somewhere but I can't find it. Thanks. --Rambone (Talk) 14:18, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Reference Svetlana Kuznetsova

Thanks for checking it but is it possible to revert back to the edit I made to bring the entry up to date please? Having problems to create an account right now, don't know if this makes a difference. prowler93—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.163.38.83 (talk • contribs) 00:31, 30 July 2006.

Hi - thanks for the heads up - I reverted the whole edit as you'd added non-only info on matches but a link to [[Image:Example.jpg]] but I see now this was incorrect. Article looks good now and I'll mark this up as my mistake in Vandalproof. Any issue in creating an acount I can advise or help on ? Happy editing - Peripitus (Talk) 00:01, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Chemical intermediates

The article Reactive intermediate is about short-lived, unstable things like carbocations and free radicals. Stable metal oxides are obviously in a different category, but they can still be "intermediates" if they're produced in one reaction and used in another. In fact, pretty much every chemical I can think of is an "intermediate", because it's created in some reactions and destroyed in others. Oxygen is just an "intermediate" between photosynthesis and respiration. I'm going to make Intermediate a disambiguation page for now, because some articles are linking to it with different meanings in mind anyway, but you're welcome to start an article Chemical intermediate or whatever. —Keenan Pepper 03:51, 31 July 2006 (UTC)