User talk:Pereth-mostu

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel A. Stout (February 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daniel A. Stout and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 17:50, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Pereth-mostu, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! LaMona (talk) 17:50, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel A. Stout (March 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines for academics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment they left was:

I frankly am not seeing anything of this satisfying the applicable professors and educators notability but I will notify DGG for his insight in case he has any comments.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daniel A. Stout and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 03:45, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Daniel A. Stout has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, , which says

Since he has edited three major books in the field and cofounded a journal and an academic society, I think he meets WP:PROF. Unfortunately, the article is not written in the style of an encyclopedia article, but of a web page. The various comments of his work should be used as footnotes, not inserted in the text, and used more concisely. Let me know when you;re ready to have it looked at again.. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 05:32, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Daniel A. Stout has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Daniel A. Stout. Thanks! joe decker ^talk 14:49, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel A. Stout (April 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zppix was:

Appears to copy and pasted because of the non-linked [#] in the text for example: Religion and Mass Media received favorable reviews in the American Journal of Sociology[7] as well as the Journal of Church and State.[8] where the [7] and [8] aren't actually references in the article they "may of" been copy and pasted from a foreign Wikipedia or from other website. However I cannot prove which site it may of come from. It also needs more references either way.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daniel A. Stout and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 18:38, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Daniel A. Stout

Hello, Pereth-mostu. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Daniel A. Stout".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 11:02, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]