User talk:Peregrine Fisher/Archive 13

Images

Hi. Thank you for linking the image and adding link to the image I uploaded. No wonder they always want to delete my "orphaned pictures" because I didn't link them to the article. Well, thank you very much :) ♥, calliegal_x (talk) 00:47, 24 April 2008 (UTC)Calliegal

Thanks :))

Hi. Thank you for linking the image and adding link to the image I uploaded. No wonder they always want to delete my "orphaned pictures" because I didn't link them to the article. Well, thank you very much :) ♥, calliegal_x (talk) 00:49, 24 April 2008 (UTC)Calliegal

No problem. I took a look at your JB pages and if someone tries to delete them I may be able to help so drop me a line. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) 01:02, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Oh, okay, thanks in advance. And do you know how to fix redirects. Like for some pages, if you don't type with capitalizing for the first letter, it doesn't go to the page. How can you fix that? ♥, calliegal_x (talk) 01:12, 24 April 2008 (UTC)Calliegal

It depends; what is the page you want the search to go to and what is it doing now? Maybe something like #REDIRECT [[Burning Up Tour]] but I need to know more. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) 01:21, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Jessie's Girl by Rick Springfield.ogg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Jessie's Girl by Rick Springfield.ogg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:05, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Teen Titans season 2 episode 11.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Teen Titans season 2 episode 11.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:08, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject College football May 2008 Newsletter

The May 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:09, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Re: Thanks

Thanks for the thanks....lol. Well there was only one episode, so I decided to improve it as best as I could. I think it looks much better now. Corn.u.co.pia ♥ Discussion 05:37, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Flirting Scholar DVD cover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Flirting Scholar DVD cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:10, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:And Eternity cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:And Eternity cover.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

The following images also have this problem:

• Image:Cover of Magik (Illyana and Storm Limited Series) 2.jpg

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --11:25, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The TV Star
		Thank you for improving TV articles instead of preventing other cleanup measures through endless wikilayering. I know encyclopedic article expansion is a much harder job than saying WP:ILIKEIT, and I do appreciate your honest efforts. – sgeureka t•c 17:02, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Cool! Thanks. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) 17:26, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

PLOT

I've seen you say this a few times on WT:NOT, but I don't think you've seen any of my replies. Basically you said that WP:PLOT doesn't allow for LOEs or lists of characters, but this isn't so. I know this for certain because it's one of the reasons I made a specific proposal (which gained support) to have WP:PLOT say per topic rather than per article. -- Ned Scott 06:29, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

We're getting there, thanks in part to people like you. It's kind of silly to worry about one or two words on a giant page, but I guess I still do. The part that worries me is the part in IINFO that says "current consensus is that Wikipedia articles are not simply... plot summaries." It's then toned down a sentence or two later that they are "appropriate as part of the larger coverage of a fictional work." "Larger coverage" is pretty ambiguous. Basically we're saying WP (maybe single WP articles, maybe groups) are not simply a plot summary, they're a bunch of OOU info on subjects that pass NOTE, with an included concise plot summary. I don't see why one couldn't nominate an LOE or LOC that doesn't have references and say the main article has the plot summary, and the article fails NOTE and PLOT. I may be missing something, of course. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) 06:53, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Ah, you do make a good point there. -- Ned Scott 07:00, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Not the Wikipedia Weekly

On 24 May 2008, 17:00 (UTC), Not the Wikipedia Weekly will host a special episode on start-up Wikipedias in African languages, and other information on Wikipedia around the world, with special guest: Gerard Meijssen of OmegaWiki, and the World Language Documentation Centre Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 00:31, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Beverly Cleary

Category:Beverly Cleary, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Cgingold (talk) 20:41, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Request for Peer Review help

Thank you for you work as a peer review volunteer. Since March, there has been a concerted effort to make sure all peer review requests get some response. Requests that have gone three days or longer without a substantial response are listed at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog. I have three requests to help this continue.

1) If you are asked to do a peer review, please ask the person who made the request to also do a review, preferably of a request that has not yet had feedback. This is fairly simple, but helps. For example when I review requests on the backlog list, I close with Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). Yours, ...

2) While there are several people who help with the backlog, lately I have been doing up to 3 or 4 peer reviews a day and can not keep this up much longer. We need help. Since there are now well over 100 names on the PR volunteers page, if each volunteer reviewed just one PR request without a response from the list each month, it would easily take care of the "no response" backlog. To help spread out the load, I suggest those willing pick a day of the month and do a review that day (for example, my first edit was on the 8th, so I could pick the 8th). Please pick a peer review request with no responses yet, if possible off the backlog list. If you want, leave a note on my talk page as to which day you picked and I will remind you each month.

3) I have made some proposals to add some limits to peer review requests at Wikipedia_talk:Peer_review#Proposed_limits. The idea is to prevent any one user from overly burdening the process. These seem fairly reasonable (one PR request per editor per day, only four total PR requests per editor at a time, PR requests with cleanup banners can be delisted (like GAN quick fail), and wait two weeks to relist a PR request after it is archived), but have gotten no feedback in one week. If you have any thoughts on these, please weigh in.

Thanks again for your help and in advance for any assistance with the backlog. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 21:12, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of One Piece episodes (US TV broadcast edition)

I have nominated List of One Piece episodes (US TV broadcast edition), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of One Piece episodes (US TV broadcast edition). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 04:13, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject College football June 2008 Newsletter

The June 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:34, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Sources

If Whoosh is not a reliable source, as you said, not lose my time. What I do not agree with the fact about IMDB not be considered a source. (SeriesYFilmes (talk) 17:47, 6 June 2008 (UTC))

IMDB is similar to TV.Com, and the last is a reliable source second User:Collectonian, the truth both would be considered sources, or both are not considered. (SeriesYFilmes (talk) 17:57, 6 June 2008 (UTC))

List of Xena: Warrior Princess episodes

The article List of Xena: Warrior Princess episodes was referred to featured articles, vote or comment on cantidate page. Thank you. (SeriesYFilmes (talk) 19:07, 8 June 2008 (UTC))

Help needed

Hey, I am trying to get List of Moonlight episodes to featured list status, and I need someone to copyedit it. If you could do it, it would be much appreciated. Thanks! Corn.u.co.pia ♥ Disc.us.sion 06:42, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

OK. I'll have free time over the next week, but not the next two days. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 07:39, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

That's good enough for me! :D Corn.u.co.pia ♥ Disc.us.sion 15:55, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Um...hi again. If you are unable to copyedit the article, that's okay, but please let me know so that I can ask another user. :D Corn.u.co.pia ♥ Disc.us.sion 06:59, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Please see Talk:List of Moonlight episodes. Corn.u.co.pia ♥ Disc.us.sion 01:01, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:A Lizard in a Woman's Skin dvd cover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:A Lizard in a Woman's Skin dvd cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:08, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Fullmetal Alchemist s01e04.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Fullmetal Alchemist s01e04.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:09, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aakaash Bangla

I resent your personal attack, and request you retract it. Corvus cornix_talk 15:53, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hwang Jin-i (TV series).

Hi. I looked at Articles for deletion/Hwang Jin-i (TV series). How does that demonstrate that NOTE is broken? The article seemed like a reasonably well referenced stub. Not stellar citations, but enough to make me think it's worth an article. I was dissapointed that the AfD was closed early and not by an admin, but I don't think that's your point. Am I missing something? Thanks. --Kevin Murray (talk) 16:43, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

PS: Does this picture look familiar?

Sailing on San Francisco Bay.

Do you sail on the Bay much? --Kevin Murray (talk) 16:46, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

LOL. Funny pic. My aunt and uncle have a sailboat they keep in the marina just south of the Bay bridge. I visity them about once a year, and we go out and have lunch at Angel Island (California). - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 17:39, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

The article looked like this when I happened on the AfD. The reason why NOTE is broken when it comes to that article is that it's about a foreign subject, and the AfD is run by people who don't know Korean. Luckily someone who knew Korean, and about Korean subjects, came along and fixed the article and knew whether it was notable or not. If they hadn't, an article on a notable subject could have easily been deleted, even though NOTE would have seemingly been followed. NOTE has basically become the English Google News Search test. This incorrectly produces "not notable" for many subjects, including foreing ones and ones that are more than a few weeks old (because newspapers archive they're stories and make them pay per view). - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 17:25, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

• Great! We love Angel Island too. We anchor overnight there a couple of times per year. We have a Catalina 380 which we keep just north of the east end of the Bay Bridge in Emeryville.
• What you describe is a gross misapplication of WP:NOTE. The Google test is a bad precedent. I've had good success keeping many articles proposed for AfD justifying the article under WP:N. I think that there are a few problems among the most serious are a broken AfD process and an overly complicated notability infrastructure -- specifically a plethora of subguidelines. I think that our energy is best spent coming up with a superior version of WP:N and then insisting on a fairer application at AfD. --Kevin Murray (talk) 19:59, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

• It's a dificult situation. Doing research can cost a lot of time, money, and effort. Searching newspaper archives with LexisNexis (and others) requires a subscription that is thousands of dollars. Some schools provide access, but that isn't a general solution. Libraries may or may not have a book, and some towns (at least in Oregon where I am) don't have libraries. Going to a library is also very difficult compared to online research. Then there's the problem of foreign subjects, which have the same problems plus a bilingual editor may be needed, and they may need to live near libraries in some other country. We do need a way to weed out unsuitable articles though, which is what makes it so difficult. Changing NOTE a bit, although I don't know exactly how, is our best bet.

Beer, funny. That picture is cropped; in the original there is a beer bottle in my left hand. Cheers to your uncle. --Kevin Murray (talk) 05:53, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Hilarious. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 06:40, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Farscape season 1 episode 22.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Farscape season 1 episode 22.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:07, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Heavy Metal (Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles)

My side of the argument has been discussed at Talk:List of Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles episodes. No opposing arguments were made. It's now a month later, and now, if any side needs to make its case, it's yours. As such, I'm reverting your edits to Heavy Metal (Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles) Misterdiscreet (talk) 17:56, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject College football July 2008 Newsletter

The July 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:38, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

thanks!

Thanks for your keep vote at Abongo Obama

It seems like such an obvious case to me.

Either way, it's hardly the end of the world . . . .

Cheers, --Utahredrock (talk) 21:47, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

In a few months his notability willl be obvious. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 21:49, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

A "new" article for Malik Obama----

is sure to be nominated for deletion; so I've actually done so myself here even though I believe it now passes muster due to Maliks multiple press mentions (which had not yet been catalogued when contributors had so very recently weighed in on its "Obongo" iteration. Please be patient with this proposal while those interested weight in again. I'm notifying those who commented.) — Justmeherenow (   ) 06:38, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

What do you think of this?

Have a look at what I've been up to. BOZ (talk) 20:50, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! Yeah, I know they're not going to help with notability. But, what they should do, is make the articles more viable for fence-sitters - some people will vote to delete (or nominate, for that matter) based on how many cleanup issues an article has, rather than how well notability is established. Plus, I've seen articles "saved" by improving them despite being unable to prove notability - you remember the Melter right?  :) BOZ (talk) 01:23, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

It's a good idea. They will be much harder to delete. We're working on changing the rules over at WP:FICT and WP:NOTE right now. You may see a watchlist notification about it in the next month or so. If you do, weigh in. Until then, keep up the good work.

I haven't worked on any D&D articles lately, but if you end up working on one that does have references that just need to be added, drop me a line. I'd like to establish notabiility for a few more articles. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 05:40, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

I've been peeking my nose in to look at all the notability debating, so I've got at least a partial idea of what's going on. Hard to tell if anything's actually being accomplished though, or if people are just spinning their wheels.  :) I do like the idea of doing an RFC based on determining alternate means of establishing notability - hope that works out well! I'm not going to get involved in the daily back-and-forth on the policy pages, but if you've got an RFC or something where I can share my thoughts I'd be glad to. BOZ (talk) 14:34, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

If anything useful happens it will be a straight yes/no vote and it will be advertised on everyone's watchlist. As you say, it mostly spinning wheels right now. It's just opinion so that's why a vote will be nice. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 17:03, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

RFC on WP:NOTE proposals

Hey. I just wanted to thank you for being pretty reasonable about these notability discussions. If you might recall, we engaged in a lot of debate with people digging in on their own interpretations. Once this stagnated, people could finally see that no progress was being made, and then the proposals started. I think we had to hit "no consensus" first before the compromises started to happen. A lot of proposals for compromise have come forward since then. And all signs seem to point towards a WP:RFC that will solicit feedback about notability on a mass scale.

User:Masem put together a RFC proposal. We haven't decided how to proceed on it, but it does not include any of the proposals anyone worked on. I fear that restarting the discussion at a general level will just lead us back to "no consensus", and at a much slower bureaucratic pace. A number of people share that fear. As such, I've gained support for an alternative RFC proposal.

My RFC proposal includes every single proposal that was put forth. Take a look. It's still a work in progress, but the basic form is there. People generally think this proposal will be more productive because takes advantage of the fact that we collectively moved the discussion forward (by offering concrete proposals for compromise). But the same people also agree that this RFC page is less readable than Masem's because it just has too much information for the average disinterested wikipedian. My RFC page is almost twice as long as Masem's!

I'm not sure that we're even going to go with my RFC page proposal. But if we do, I wanted to ask if you would consider withdrawing your proposal that "An abundance of trivial coverage can establish notability". It's actually a good proposal and I might even support it. But I think it might be a little off topic, and clutters the two main issues of the current debate. (Those issues are A: the notability of sub-articles, and B: the interaction between the GNG and the specific notability guidelines.) I'm personally on the fence about removing your proposal, but removing it woulds horten the RFC page and improve our organization and focus. You might be doing this process a big favor by withdrawing this one. But if you don't want to, I understand, and we'll wait to see what a consensus of other editors say.

I'd appreciate your comment at Wikipedia_talk:Notability#Meta-proposal_to_improve_readability_.28step_one.29. Thanks in advance. Randomran (talk) 01:38, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

TUSC token f105f30780cfc59e4afc872663349827

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

TV Squad

Yeah, bad news. A lot of the times TV Squad is the only site that reviews episodes; hopefully it doesn't get deleted. Corn.u.co.pia ŢĐЌ Disc.us.sion 06:04, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Any ideas on how we can stop it from being deleted? That source you used to support the site at the reliable sources page looked good. Can that be used? Corn.u.co.pia ŢĐЌ Disc.us.sion 09:28, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

The article was really about weblogs and all its blogs, TV Squads parent company. It would be good for describing how TVS works, but it wasn't really doing much for notability. I'll merge TV Squad into weblogs for now to avoid the deletion, and maybe we can find info later for it and bring it back. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 16:39, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Good compromise. I think it's good enough for now. Corn.u.co.pia ŢĐЌ Disc.us.sion 12:06, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

notability

Thanks. Is all discussion confined to Randomran's sandbox page, or is there any discussion of his problems/proposals on the main policy talk page? Slrubenstein | Talk 17:06, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

The discussion is happening at Wikipedia_talk:Notability#Copy-editing_the_upcoming_RFC_page. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 21:24, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject College football August 2008 Newsletter

The August 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:27, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Laurie Jupeczyk.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Laurie Jupeczyk.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:08, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Lathander

Hello,

Lathander, an article you have been involved in editing, has been nominated for deletion. If there is anything you can do to improve the article so that it may be kept, please do so.  :) BOZ (talk) 23:41, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Hunter × Hunter episode 32.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Hunter × Hunter episode 32.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:03, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Hunter × Hunter episode 34.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Hunter × Hunter episode 34.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:09, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Hunter × Hunter episode 36.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Hunter × Hunter episode 36.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:10, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Hi

Hi Peregrine, I teach mostly hardware classes at the University of Michigan Ann Arbor. I've managed to miss all machine learning things (which is odd, because I've had two bosses who are machine learning folks). Hobit (talk) 08:14, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Peer review: Pilot (30 Rock)

I've just noticed that your user name is listed at WP:PRV as a volunteer peer reviewer. I was wondering if you could, please, by any chance take a look at reviewing Pilot (30 Rock) which is currently mid-way through a review. Any help is greatly appreciated. -- Jɑɱǐε Jcɑ 13:30, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:How I Met Your Mother s01e21.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:How I Met Your Mother s01e21.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:04, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Stairway to Heaven by Led Zeppelin.ogg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Stairway to Heaven by Led Zeppelin.ogg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 03:06, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

SF copyedit

Hi, i was wondering if you could give Homosexuality in speculative fiction a copy edit: For grammar, (British) spelling, checking it makes sense to general readers (jargon), whether there is too much repetition, is too listy. I'm working on the lead now. the refs i will format properly soon, unless you are really bored and want something to do .-).

Article is being worked up to GA class (not FA), but i can't find anyone who wants to help (all the wikiprojects it is part of have ignored it). It's listed for peer review, so any comments would be welcome there too Yobmod (talk) 14:58, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject College football September 2008 Newsletter

The September 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:51, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Wasilla Assembly of God and WSJ comment

The issue isn't as much the reliability of the Wall Street Journal — and no, I would not qualify them as reliable on everything — but whether this commentary is appropriate for this article, as it carries a negative point of view. This sort of comment does not exist on other articles about individual Assemblies of God congregations, nor do similar comments about a denomination's doctrines and beliefs appear on the articles for individual congregations within those denominations. And they shouldn't. This commentary was inserted parimarily to cast the church, and by extension Sarah Palin, in a negative light and therefore violates NPOV. Please read the discussion about this at Talk:Wasilla Assembly of God, then reconsider your reverting of this POV comment. (I cannot revert it myself due to WP:3RR.) - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 07:44, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

We don't censor WP and I would add that type of info to any church or organization page, not just this one. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 16:51, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

It is not censorship and you know it. The quote is out of place, and belongs in the main article about the denomination. You might place this info on other articles about individual churches, but you would be one of very few. As you can see on the talk page, the general consensus is that the quote is out of place, and another editor has moved it to its proper place. I have further added context for the quote. If you have further comment about this, please post your comments on the Wasilla A/G talk page. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 23:09, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

D&D articles for Wikipedia 0.7

Hi there!  :)

As someone who's worked on D&D and/or RPG articles before, I'm inviting you to participate in our goal to both improve articles that have been selected to be placed in the next Wikipedia DVD release, as well as nominate more to be selected for this project. For more details, please see the WikiProject D&D talk page for more details. :) BOZ (talk) 18:09, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Hannah Montana S01E02.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Hannah Montana S01E02.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:25, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Silver Age of Comic Books

Your removal of nearly all the images from the Silver Age of Comic Books page have rendered it astonishingly boring for an article about comic books, which, when last I checked, was still a visual medium. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mweflen (talk • contribs) 07:16, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

NBA Heights article

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Are_NBA_official_height_listings_reliable_-_do_they_have_a_reputation_for_fact-checking_and_accuracy.3F - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 07:15, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the help

Hey thanks for helping me explain how to get the license right for the Kevjumba picture. Also thanks for the effort you put into that entry. This is all new to me so by looking at how you modified it, I learned alot.

Alessandroval —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alessandroval (talk • contribs) 09:43, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:And Eternity cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:And Eternity cover.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:19, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Flirting Scholar DVD cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Flirting Scholar DVD cover.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:19, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Read the messages :) , The Fair use rationale needs to be IN DEPTH... Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:54, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Now resolved :) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:56, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Kevin Wu DYK nom

Hi. I've nominated Kevin Wu, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article at Template talk:Did you know#Articles created/expanded on September 27, where you can improve it if you see fit. Thanks, -- Suntag ☼ 19:16, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for any help.

Thanks for the note, it helped me understand what was going on. I would love any help on creating a wiki page for Zumeo. I actually looked at a few others, namely wiki/jobster and tried to follow a similar format. I added in links to third party content, one of which was negative about our services in an honest effort to be balanced and transparent. We've also had a feature story CNBC Business Radio (you can hear it on our home page, www.zumeo.com) and a local TV news outlet recently do a story.

All that to say, I really do want to provide valuable content on Wikipedia. We are a legitimate business and I would think we have as much place here as any other business. I am very new to this wiki thing and to be honest with you kind of confused on the usability, so again, any help you can offer would be very very appreciated.

Best, Mat --MatRudi (talk) 21:27, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Peregrine your contributions in editing and and formatting are very appreciated. I viewed the Cave Junction page and was very impressed with your skill using Wikipedia and writing in general. We will continue to expand our Wiki page and add more authoritative references as we get them. We will also encourage other qualified editors to contribute to the page as appropriate. If you see a problem with the page in the future, please warn me and I will don anything I can to fix it. Thanks Again. Mat --MatRudi (talk) 13:45, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

• Re this edit: with your contributions history you really ought to know that since you are not the author, you are allowed to remove a speedy tag. Please read the tags! — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 18:14, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Sorry, I forgot. Haven't dealt with a CSD in a while. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 18:22, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Heaven by Bryan Adams.ogg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Heaven by Bryan Adams.ogg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:36, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

DYK for Kevin Wu

On 3 October, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kevin Wu, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 16:39, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Smile

DiverseMentality^(Boo!) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

WikiProject College football October 2008 Newsletter

The October 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:14, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Collectonian and Lord S are AfD'ing an article from DBZ again

They didn't even notify the talk page where consensus was just reached, this really is reprehensible. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tien_Shinhan#Tien_Shinhan JJJ999 (talk) 07:08, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

GACC

Just to let you know, I don't think you've signed up as a member. You obviously are one of the most active there, but be sure to add your name.--LAAFan^sign _review 00:59, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

I usually sign up for things and then don't participate, so I'm trying the opposite this time. ;-) - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 01:06, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

You're working hard on Jackie Robinson, so I guess there's no reason to rock the boat! :D--LAAFan^sign _review 01:22, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Portland Center Stage

Been focusing on a lot of things right now and I think I might need a couple more days to work on adding a "Plays" section to the article. I hope that's okay. Cirt (talk) 07:13, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

That's fine. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 11:37, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

FWIW, I've done a bit of work since that comment, splitting out a new subsection Productions, which highlights some important plays during the major transition periods. Working on adding a bit more. Cirt (talk) 11:42, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Talk:Portland Center Stage/GA1 - If you think it's GA-quality now then great, of course I'll continue to work on the article as it improves further in quality and take it to a peer review later on, but for now I've finished working on it per your recommendations. Cheers, Cirt (talk) 02:58, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

FF Cover

[1][2][3]-Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 12:35, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Re: Jackie Robinson

Reviewing's in progress. Some of it is at Talk:Jackie Robinson/GA1 so far, ideally i should be done with it in a few hours. Wizardman 00:24, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Super cool. Thanks. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 00:28, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Hey man, good luck! :) Having just finished with Gary Gygax I've seen how much work it can take to get an article to GA! BOZ (talk) 02:17, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Great job with Gygax. We need every DnD GA we can get. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 02:20, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Agreed! And comics too - I've nominated Wizards of the Coast, and will hit up a handful of notables before moving on to comics articles. Gygax was reviewed by Jclemens, who also did Bunnies and Burrows by the way; as promised, he was fair and a good judge, and knows his stuff. Took a few weeks to get through it, but that was worth it given the results. :) He offered to pick up any D&D articles I nominated, so I'm waiting to see if he can get around to the WotC article. BOZ (talk) 02:35, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Kevin Wu

Why is you article on GA nominations page Kevin Wu redirected to KevJumba? If the article is about KevJumba, I recommend that change the wording to reflect the title. Or else get the redirect changed back! Regards, —Mattisse (Talk) 22:18, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Forever book cover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Forever book cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:26, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Bones season 1 episode 22.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bones season 1 episode 22.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:05, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:N ohmu.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:N ohmu.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:06, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Good job!

		The Special Barnstar
		I award you this Special Barnstar for not only making the KevJumba article notable after many of its deletions, but also bringing it to GA status. Amazing job there. DiverseMentality 22:32, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Thank you. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 22:44, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject: Dungeons & Dragons

Hi! I’ve been working on a lot of ‘’Dungeons & Dragons’’ articles lately and saw that you were a member of WikiProject Dungeons & Dragons), and am inviting you to rejoin Wikipedia’s D&D group. I've been hard at work removing tags placed inappropriately on D&D articles, as well as modifying articles to remove tags that were placed legitimately. In addition, I have been compiling related articles together so that the articles are longer, making it easier to remove tags and to have short articles on lesser topics by just putting it into another appropriate article (links to such compiled articles can be found on my userpage). Check out the project here , and ask any questions that you may have here. Thank you for your time. Drilnoth (talk) 20:53, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Jackie Robinson FA push

Hello again. It was a pleasure working with you to bring Jackie Robinson to WP:GA status. I know you want to bring the article to FA status, so there I ask, do you have any plans to do so? I believe there are still improvements needed if we're going to get it to FA status. I'm thinking of starting a peer review on the article first. Thoughts? – RyanCross (talk) 04:38, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

I do want to take it to FA, but I'm housesitting and their internet doesn't work. I may work on it a bit at other people's houses, or it may take I while before I can get to it. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 18:48, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Alright thanks. Well, I think I'll start a peer review soon just to have more people's opinions on the article. I'll drop you a line when I have started it so we can work on the comments together. Cheers, – RyanCross (talk) 19:25, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

I'm kinda working on it now. I'm trying to find a format for 1948 that can be used for the rest of his seasons. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 19:34, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

From one PF to another

Happy birthday! -Pete (talk)

WikiProject College football December 2008 Newsletter

The December 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
Automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:01, 3 December 2008 (UTC)