User talk:Perdika1

Perdika1, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Perdika1! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Benzband (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:09, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Diocese of Kumanovo and Osogovo

added a link pointing to Kratovo

Diocese of Polog and Kumanovo

added a link pointing to Kratovo

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Serbian True Orthodox Church

Hello, Perdika1,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Serbian True Orthodox Church should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serbian True Orthodox Church .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Steve Lux, Jr. (talk) 23:59, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I understand the rules of Wikipedia but there is no reason of deleting this page maybe some parts of the page need more clarifying because there is not much sources for this church on internet

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Perdika1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock my account on Wikicommons. my little brother had been using the same computer and he uploaded some unlicensed files, he also used other emails to make an account and uploaded from them also. I'll change my password so this kind of damage doesn't happen again

Decline reason:

We cannot remove blocks from Wikimedia Commons here. You will need to wait for your request to be handled there. Mike V • Talk 22:50, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi Perdika1.

The account User:Perdika1 was blocked indefinitely because it is believed you used it to evade the original block on the account User:Perdika. If indeed you operated both these accounts, I would advise focusing on Perdika and forgetting about Perdika1 (and all other accounts if you have any) because engaging in sockpuppetry is almost always going to result in a block, be it on Commons or on Wikipedia.

The Perdika account is currently blocked for a month, so you could always just wait until the block expires on September 4, 2014 before resuming your editing/uploading on Wikimedia Commons. Or you could appeal the block; but you'll have to do that on the Commons usertalkpage of the account you wish to have unblocked, not your Wikipedia one. Also note that reasons such as "my little brother did it", while often true, cannot be verified; so for your request to succeed the most important thing to do is explain/demonstrate that you won't violate Wikimedia Commons policies once unblocked.

Either way, when you resume editing be sure to upload appropriately licensed files. In certain limited cases, non-free content may be uploaded to Wikipedia, but never to Commons. Cheers, benzband (talk) 10:01, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Diocese of Povardarie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Veles. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]