User talk:Peppermintschnapps

your edits to John F. MacArthur

I have reverted to the version with the paragraph regarding MacArthur's views on Catholicism in paragraph form. Hokie RNB 03:15, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I edited the statement you added to this article that MacArthur "... thinks that monks and priests are a combination of homosexual and criminals" Although he refers to them as "inmates", it's not clear from the quote that he views them as "criminals". Just let the quote stand for itself. Ἀλήθεια (talk) 12:26, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on John F. MacArthur. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Ἀλήθεια (talk) 10:34, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Parks,Chesin and Walbert

A tag has been placed on Parks,Chesin and Walbert requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. -- Big Dom 20:12, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

Your recent edit to the page Maureen Dowd appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any other tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Viriditas (talk) 05:33, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Maureen Dowd. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Viriditas (talk) 02:07, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page

I reverted your user page to a previous version as the current version did not appear to match your contribs and I was concerned that your account had been compromised. You may want to reset your password with a combination of letters and numbers. Thanks. Viriditas (talk) 11:14, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am awaiting an answer as I have now reverted your user page twice. Are you the original owner of this account? Viriditas (talk) 02:32, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]