User talk:Peoeagle

Edit warring at Ironwood High School

Help Peoeagle. Recently you restored a bunch of material that was the subject of an edit war reported at WP:AN3. You have not made any effort to join in a discussion at Talk:Ironwood High School to find out whether anyone else supports your edits. If you will participate in discussions then the chance of adverse consequences, such as an edit warring block, will be greatly reduced. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 00:12, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have ignored my warning and you have restored your material yet again. So far as I can tell nobody supports your change. Now considering a block. EdJohnston (talk) 01:06, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reported at WP:AN3

You've been reported at WP:AN3#User:Peoeagle reported by User:EdJohnston (Result: ). You may respond there if you wish. EdJohnston (talk) 02:04, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Ironwood High School. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. -- DQ (t) (e) 02:29, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of high schools in the Peoria Unified School District for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of high schools in the Peoria Unified School District is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of high schools in the Peoria Unified School District (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Raymie (t • c) 02:16, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:EagleEmblem.gif

Thanks for uploading File:EagleEmblem.gif. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 07:25, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]